Skip to content Skip to footer

Kristi Noem Warns of “War” If Biden Federalizes National Guard in TX Dispute

Noem is on the short list of potential vice presidential running mates being considered by Donald Trump.

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem gestures as she speaks at the Calvin Coolidge Foundation conference at the Library of Congress on February 17, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

South Dakota Republican Gov. Kristi Noem, a potential far right running mate for Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election, suggested on Sunday that there could be a violent altercation between GOP-run states and the Biden administration if President Joe Biden federalizes control of states’ National Guard units in order to address a disagreement about razor wire barriers at the U.S.-Mexico border.

The barriers — which human rights advocates say are a violation of international law — were erected at the order of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) to deter migrants from crossing into the state, and have resulted in numerous horrific injuries for migrants. After U.S. Border Patrol agents began removing the barriers in October, a federal judge intervened and ordered them to stop. A Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling upheld that order, but that was reversed by the Supreme Court in January, which recognized that the lower courts ignored aspects of federalism — including the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution — in barring the federal agents from performing their functions.

Despite that order from the Supreme Court, Abbott has promised to continue to place the barriers on Texas’s border with Mexico. The Court’s ruling didn’t tell the state it had to stop, just that federal agents could dismantle the barriers without interference.

As Texas continues to escalate the situation, other anti-immigrant GOP governors across the country — including Noem — have pledged to support Abbott, including by potentially sending their own National Guard troops to the border. Noem has ordered a special session of her state legislature in order to discuss that option.

In an interview on Fox News on Sunday, Noem warned Biden not to intervene in the situation any further, saying that such a move would risk a “war” between the federal government and the GOP-led states.

Under the Constitution, Biden has the right to federalize state National Guard units to support his goals — such actions aren’t without precedent, as the National Guard was federalized, for example, in 1957, after Arkansas used its units to block school integration.

“If he’s willing to do that and take away my authority as governor as commander-in-chief of those National Guard, boy, we do have a war on our hands,” Noem said.

Noem’s violent rhetoric and opposition to the Biden administration is perhaps why former President Donald Trump is seriously considering her to be his vice presidential running mate in the 2024 race.

“Kristi Noem has been incredible fighting for me,” Trump said in a recent appearance on Fox News. “She said ‘I’d never run against him because I can’t beat him.’ That was a very nice thing to say.”

Notably, Noem’s support for far right border actions has led to opposition from the Oglala Sioux Tribe, which has announced that it is forbidding Noem from entering their jurisdictions.

“Calling the United States’ southern border in Texas an ‘invasion’ by illegal immigrants and criminal groups to justify sending S.D. National Guard troops there is a red herring that the Oglala Sioux Tribe doesn’t support,” Frank Star Comes Out, president of the Oglala Sioux Tribe, said in a statement addressed to Noem in response to comments she made last week about the border.

Star Comes Out also noted within his statement that Noem’s and other governors’ words were creating “a bogus border crisis just to help Trump get re-elected,” and that Noem’s actions were specifically meant to promote herself as “his [potential] running mate.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 98 new monthly donors before midnight tonight.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy