Skip to content Skip to footer

Jan 6 Committee Will Hold Steve Bannon in Contempt for Violating Subpoena Order

A vote on holding Bannon in contempt of Congress could come as early as Tuesday.

Former White House Chief Strategist and Senior Counselor to President Donald Trump Steve Bannon speaks at a conference in Brussels, Belgium, in 2018.

The House select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the United States Capitol building by a mob of loyalists to former President Donald Trump will move to file a criminal complaint against Steve Bannon, a former Trump aide who refused to comply with a subpoena order from the commission.

The chair of the committee, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi), announced that a vote on Bannon’s fate would take place on Tuesday of next week. From there, a vote in the House of Representatives will take place — and if Bannon is found in contempt of Congress by a majority of the legislative body, the matter will then be forwarded to the Department of Justice (DOJ).

“Mr. Bannon has declined to cooperate with the select committee and is instead hiding behind the former president’s insufficient, blanket and vague statements regarding privileges he has purported to invoke,” Thompson said in a statement on Thursday.

Fellow committee member Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) echoed Thompson’s comments in a social media post.

“Steve Bannon has violated a congressional subpoena and missed his opportunity — w/o jail time or court order — to come clean about the Jan. 6 insurrection,” Raskin said on Twitter. “He will face the full force of the law for the smirking contempt he is showing Congress and the American people.”

Robert Costello, one of Bannon’s lawyers, said earlier this week that “until … you reach an agreement with President Trump” on executive privilege claims, his client wouldn’t comply with the congressional subpoena, which demanded documents related to the January 6 attack and closed-door testimony from Bannon.

Previously, Trump has told four of his former aides who were subpoenaed by the select committee to defy their orders. However, at least two of his former aides appear to be cooperating with the commission’s work.

The DOJ has already stated that former aides to Trump need not worry about violating Trump’s supposed executive privilege. In a memo the department released this summer, the DOJ stated that those who worked for Trump could give “unrestricted testimony” to the commission without fear of violating the former president’s rights.

This past week, President Joe Biden formally rejected Trump’s executive privilege claims, and the Biden administration ordered that the National Archives hand over any documents requested by the commission from Trump’s time in the White House relating to the attack on the Capitol.

“President Biden does not uphold the former President’s assertion of privilege,” White House counsel Dana Remus wrote in a letter to the Archivist of the United States David Ferriero.

The Presidential Records Act gives final decision-making power related to claims of executive privilege to the current president. Former presidents may sue if they disagree with their decision to release documents from their time in the White House, but courts have generally sided with litigants seeking to make such information public record.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.