Members of the Israeli security cabinet voted to expand Israel’s brutal invasion of Rafah on Thursday, a report finds, amid warnings that a larger scale operation would escalate the genocide that is already characterized by atrocities unprecedented in modern times.
Axios reported on Friday that the officials approved an “expansion of the area of operation” of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), according to three unnamed sources. They also called for the continuation of a hostage release and ceasefire deal, though Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich — two of the Israeli government’s most extremist leaders — voted against it, having called for a suspension of negotiations despite the release of hostages being on the line.
One of the sources said that the newly approved operations would make it so that the Rafah invasion, which the IDF began this week after months of shelling in the region, would cross the Biden administration’s “red line” of an invasion of Rafah. The other two sources said it wouldn’t.
In an interview this week, President Joe Biden said that his administration would withhold some 2,000 pound bombs — which are typically used for large-scale destruction — from weapons shipments to Israel if Israel invaded Rafah. In those comments, Biden claimed that Israeli forces hadn’t yet gone into Rafah, despite vast amounts of evidence that troops are on the ground in the southern city.
Earlier this week, U.S. officials said that Israel hadn’t yet crossed Biden’s red line with its invasion, even as Israeli forces have begun blocking all aid from entering through Gaza’s border crossings and have killed dozens of Palestinians in Rafah, including a 4-month-old baby.
A U.S. official has supposedly pushed back on the expansion of the invasion, but the administration has continued its unconditional support of Israel’s genocide in all other contexts so far.
“We are in a week with a significant decrease in the aid that is going in,” a U.S. official told Axios, downplaying the fact that no aid has entered Gaza for three days. “This is precisely the kind of thing we warned the Israelis against. It’s a microcosm of everything the Israelis have done for the past seven months, which is why we don’t trust them at all to do Rafah right.”
Even as the official expressed this supposed frustration, however, the U.S. voted against granting Palestine more access to the UN in a key UN General Assembly vote on Friday. The resolution, which passed 143 to 9, encourages the UN Security Council to consider Palestine’s request to join the UN as a member state.
The U.S. joined Israel in the minority of votes after having vetoed a Security Council resolution last month to block Palestine from becoming a full UN member.
The U.S.’s continued diplomatic support for Israel suggests that U.S. officials are not reneging on their support for the genocide even as Israeli troops imminently threaten the survival of every person in Gaza with their siege of Rafah. Israeli forces’ full aid blockade means no food or fuel is entering Gaza in a time of rapidly accelerating famine and disease.
Humanitarian groups and advocates for Palestinian rights have warned of catastrophe “beyond imagination” if Israel escalates its assault on Rafah even further, on top of already “unspeakable” conditions, as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) has noted.
“A massive ground attack in Rafah would lead to an epic humanitarian disaster,” said UN Secretary-General António Guterres. “The international community must speak with one voice for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza, the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages, and a massive surge in life-saving aid.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.