Israeli officials’ ceasefire demands show that they aren’t just using ceasefire negotiations to prolong their genocide of Gaza, but also to secure permission to further deepen their colonization of Palestine, a UN expert has said.
In the latest ceasefire talks, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been insistent that Israel be able to maintain a permanent military occupation of Gaza’s border with Egypt and a corridor built by Israeli forces cutting across the middle of the Gaza Strip, which Israelis respectively call the Philadelphi Corridor and Netzarim Corridor.
Israel’s insistence on maintaining control over these corridors is a clear show of their intention to expand their ethnic cleansing and “eat up” more of Palestine, said Francesca Albanese, UN special rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territories.
“Under the guise of ‘ceasefire negotiations’ Israel is trying to create the conditions for permanent occupation and more land grab. Those familiar with Palestine’s history recognize in what is happening to the Palestinians under Israel’s unlawful occupation, the pattern of settler colonialism,” said Albanese on social media on Thursday.
Albanese shared an observation from University of Edinburgh international relations professor Nicola Perugini, who noted: “Corridors are key tools of fragmentation, enclavisation and land dispossession in the history of Israel’s colonisation of Palestine. Corridors (Allon Plan etc) were key in settling the West Bank.”
The Allon Plan was a proposal drawn up by then-Deputy Prime Minister Yigal Allon after the 1967 war to annex Gaza, forcibly transfer Palestinians, and partition the West Bank. As part of the plan, corridors would be built to connect the areas partitioned to Israel and Jordan. The plan was never put in place, but experts have noted that its principles of annexation and forcible transfers have echoed across decades of Zionist policy.
Indeed, over the past months, Israel has built two corridors in Gaza that analysts say indicate their intention for a permanent military occupation. According to Forensic Architecture, as well as the Netzarim Corridor, Israel has been building a road that gives Israeli forces direct access to Gaza City. The construction of these two corridors are “infrastructural indications of an intended military presence” in north Gaza, the group said.
At the same time, a permanent Israeli takeover of the Philadelphi corridor — a major sticking point for Netanyahu in negotiations — would mean that Israel gets to control the entirety of Gaza’s border, as its border with Egypt is the only side of Gaza not surrounded by Israel. Hamas has been strongly opposed to Israel’s occupation of the two corridors in negotiations.
In essence, Israel’s position in the ceasefire talks is for there to be no ceasefire — for Israel to be allowed to continue its genocide for as long as Israeli leaders desire — and for mediators to give Israel permission to expand its occupation of Palestine. This means that, if U.S. officials agree to an Israeli “ceasefire” plan, they are not only giving the green light to the genocide, but also for Israel to take steps toward annexing Gaza.
Corporate media outlets have covered the ceasefire talks with abandon, willingly repeating U.S. officials’ claims that Hamas, not Israel, is opposed to a ceasefire — despite Hamas leaders’ clear acceptance of President Joe Biden’s three-phase ceasefire deal.
These outlets seemingly seek to obfuscate the truth of the negotiations and run endless cover for Israel; in fact, perhaps sensing Israel’s positioning in the talks, The Atlantic published a much-criticized article recently essentially seeking to redefine the entire concept of settler colonialism in order to absolve Israel of the bloody practice.
Experts and commentators have noted that the true purpose of the ceasefire talks and the U.S.’s participation in them, is to give license for the genocide to continue.
Like the Oslo process in the 1990s, analyst Mouin Rabbani said recently, the ceasefire talks serve as a way to “buy time” for Israel’s genocide. “[T]heir purpose is process, and their objective has therefore been to avoid reaching a ceasefire agreement rather than concluding one,” Rabbani wrote.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.