Israel used U.S.-made bombs in a brutal attack on a displacement camp in Rafah that killed 45 Palestinians in May, a new investigation reveals.
According to The New York Times, on May 26, Israel deployed two 250-pound bombs — Boeing’s GBU-39 “small diameter” bombs that caused a blast that could kill and injure in a 570 foot radius — on sheds built for residential purposes in Kuwaiti Al-Salam Camp 1. There were roughly 60 camps within 500 feet of the blast, according to the investigation.
The attack was horrific. The blast and ensuing fire killed 45 Palestinians, including eight children, and injured 249 others. Images emerged of a decapitated baby and families pulling charred bodies out of the rubble as a blaze raged on across what was left of the tents. There was blood everywhere, and one doctor said the area smelled of “burned flesh.”
One 37-year-old man, Saleh Mohammed al-Hila, had been sheltering in the camp with his family since March, with his sister and mother in another tent nearby. His family had already been displaced four times. On the day of the bombing, he returned from his sister’s tent to his own for evening prayers, and was going to bring his 2-year-old son to see his grandmother.
Then the bombs hit, killing Al-Hila’s mother, sister, 15-year-old niece and 1-year old nephew. The family was only able to identify the baby by the color of his trousers, the Times reported.
“I feel I am dying and having a nightmare I cannot forget or get out of,” al-Hila told The New York Times.
The densely-populated camp in southern Gaza, just north of Rafah, was built in Tal Al-Sultan refugee camp area just months ago for Palestinians who have been displaced, many multiple times, throughout Israel’s genocide. It was located close to humanitarian warehouses and health centers, and has now been largely evacuated due to the attack.
The camp was in an area that did not receive evacuation orders ahead of Israel’s invasion of Rafah in May. A Times analysis of the location of the bombing, which Israeli forces claimed killed two Hamas leaders, concluded that Israel had likely not taken “adequate care to safeguard civilians,” as it is obligated to do under international law.
One organization that was aiding in running the camp, Al-Salam Association for Humanitarian and Charitable Works, said not only were Israeli officials aware of the camp, but they had also had a say in its location when it was built.
U.S. law prohibits U.S. weapons from being used to violate international law. But, despite constantly mounting evidence that Israel has been using U.S. weapons to indiscriminately bomb civilians in its campaign to exterminate Palestinians in Gaza, the Biden administration has refused to stop sending weapons to Israel.
Another report, released on Thursday, also found that U.S. weapons were likely used in a possible war crime in November. According to EuroMed Human Rights Monitor, an Israeli attack on a residential area in Jabalia refugee camp on November 1, which killed 120 people, was likely carried out by U.S. bombs. Israeli aircraft dropped 6 to 8 bombs on the area, targeting residential buildings and a kindergarten.
The analysis found that an Israeli attack the previous day was likely carried out with 2,000 pound JDAMs, and that the November 1 attack carried similarities in terms of size, outcome and the “patterns of destruction” caused by the blasts. Overall, the two attacks killed 195 Palestinians, wounded at least 777 more, and buried about 120 people under the rubble, Palestinian officials said.
“The attack was either deliberately direct or excessively indiscriminate, all of which are classified as full-fledged war crimes under the Rome Statute,” EuroMed Monitor wrote.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.