Skip to content Skip to footer

Israel Returns Associated Press’s Equipment Following Outcry Over Confiscation

Israel’s seizure of the camera is “part of a pattern of aggression against journalism,” said one free press advocate.

Two members of the press watch as smoke rises between damaged buildings after the ongoing ground and airstrikes by the Israeli forces at Al Jenenah neighborhood in Rafah, Gaza on May 15, 2024.

Israel’s communications ministry has ordered officials to return broadcasting equipment to The Associated Press after their seizure of the equipment earlier this week was met with widespread condemnation from news organizations.

On Tuesday, Israeli officials told journalists with The Associated Press who had been broadcasting a live feed view of northern Gaza from inside Israel that they had to move their equipment — even though the journalists were in compliance with Israel’s laws on media coverage of its genocide. The journalists running the broadcast were then given a document, signed by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi, alleging that they had broken a newly-passed law targeting the Qatar-based outlet Al Jazeera.

Israeli officials accused The Associated Press of providing images and reporting to Al Jazeera, which has been a frequent target of Israeli repression due to its reporting on Israel’s occupation of Palestine; earlier this month, authorities raided Al Jazeera’s office in East Jerusalem, confiscating its equipment and temporarily banning it from broadcasting inside Israel.

In actuality, The Associated Press had been sharing the feed with thousands of news agencies around the world, not just Al Jazeera. After giving journalists the document alleging they had broken the law, the ministry confiscated a camera and other equipment being operated by The Associated Press.

Before the equipment’s removal, the livestream had been showing consistent scenes of smoke rising above northern Gaza, where no foreign journalists are allowed to operate due to Israel’s classification of the area as a “closed military zone.”

Israel’s action against The Associated Press was condemned by several international press freedom organizations.

“Banning broadcasters because Israel disagrees with their coverage is the hallmark of an authoritarian state, not a democracy,” said Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) Deputy Advocacy Director Caitlin Vogus. “Seizing equipment from The AP just for supplying a news outlet with video footage is disgraceful.”

The Foreign Press Association similarly denounced Israel’s crackdown on journalists.

“Israel’s record on press freedom already has been dismal throughout the war. It has prevented independent access to Gaza for foreign journalists,” the association said in a statement.

Emily Wilkins, president of the U.S.-based National Press Club, lambasted Israeli officials’ seizure of the equipment, saying:

There was no strategic reason for these actions, which are part of a pattern of aggression against journalism organizations by Israel. The lengths to which Israel is willing to go to stop news coverage of the military action in Gaza must not be overlooked by the media still covering the conflict and the public at large.

Notably, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre refused to condemn Israel’s action, saying only that it was “concerning” and that the Biden administration wants to “look into it.”

After Israel’s seizure of the equipment was met with international backlash, Karhi announced that he had “ordered that the equipment be returned to The AP news agency.”

The Associated Press celebrated the return of its equipment but noted concerns about Israel’s restrictions on foreign journalists.

“While we are pleased with this development, we remain concerned about the Israeli government’s use of the foreign broadcaster law and the ability of independent journalists to operate freely in Israel,” the company said in a statement.

In addition to escalating its crackdowns on foreign journalists, Israel has consistently attacked Palestinian journalists inside of Gaza. According to a preliminary investigation by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), as of May 22, Israeli forces have killed 105 journalists and media workers since the start of October. In many cases, Palestinian journalists in Gaza have reported being deliberately targeted by the Israeli military.

“Journalists are civilians who are protected by international humanitarian law in times of conflict,” said CPJ Program Director Carlos Martínez de la Serna. “Those responsible for their deaths face dual trials: one under international law and another before history’s unforgiving gaze.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.