The Israeli Knesset is set to consider on Wednesday whether it will bar Al Jazeera journalists from covering Israel’s war on Palestinians in a move that has been widely condemned by press freedom advocates.
Earlier this month, Israeli Minister of Communications Shlomo Karhi said that he was considering banning the network, claiming that the agency was harming national morale amid Israel’s indiscriminate military campaign against Palestinians in Gaza. Karhi accused Al Jazeera — which has provided unparalleled reporting on Israel’s siege of Gaza on the ground — of being a “propaganda mouthpiece” for Hamas after it published comments from the organization’s leaders.
“This is a station that incites, this is a station that films troops in assembly areas (outside Gaza) … that incites against the citizens of Israel,” Karhi alleged.
Days later, Netanyahu’s cabinet approved regulations that would empower the government to shutter foreign-based news agencies if it claims their reporting is damaging to Israel’s national security interests. Israel-based Haaretz reports that the full measure will be considered by the Knesset on Wednesday.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has condemned the proposal.
“We are deeply concerned by Israeli officials’ threats to censor media coverage of the ongoing Israel-Gaza conflict, using vague accusations of harming national morale,” the organization wrote earlier this month. “CPJ urges Israel not to ban Al-Jazeera and to allow journalists to do their jobs. A plurality of media voices is essential in order to hold power to account, especially in times of war.”
This isn’t the first time the Israeli government has cracked down on journalists covering Palestine, CPJ pointed out. In 2017, the Israeli government similarly threatened to shutter Al Jazeera, cynically accusing the network of inciting violence in its coverage of protests. In 2022, Israeli forces shot and killed Al Jazeera Arabic’s Palestinian American correspondent Shireen Abu Akleh while she was covering an Israeli army operation in the West Bank.
Jon Allsop, a freelance journalist writing for the Columbia Journalist Review, also noted that Israel’s current government has a long history of attacks on the press.
“The level of domestic anger at Netanyahu and his allies is such that they will surely not be able to avoid scrutiny. But if past is prologue, they will try,” Allsop said in an op-ed last week.
At least 31 journalists in the region have been killed since October 7, the Committee to Protect Journalists has said, including four Israeli reporters, one Lebanese reporter, and 26 Palestinian reporters, the vast majority of whom were killed by Israeli airstrikes.
Journalists in Gaza and the West Bank have said that they now face unprecedented repression — and, in some cases, what appears to be deliberate Israeli gunfire — as they attempt to document the horrors of Israel’s genocidal siege of Gaza.
“Since October 7, it’s been even more difficult for journalists to get around the occupied territories. Reporting on some developments has become very challenging as a result of police deployment and settlers riled up against the Arab press,” said Mosab Shawer, a freelance photojournalist in Hebron, West Bank, per Al Jazeera. “In all my 15 years of reporting, never did I feel this much helplessness and fear.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 24 hours to add 180 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.