Skip to content Skip to footer

If Democrats Win in Georgia They Will Be Rid of Power Sharing Rules in Senate

If Warnock wins, it could end the power-sharing arrangement between Democrats and Republicans in the Senate.

Sen. Raphael Warnock holds a press conference to discuss his runoff campaign on November 10, 2022, in Atlanta, Georgia.

Although it’s likely that Democrats will maintain control of the Senate in the next session of Congress, experts warn that the Georgia runoff election between Sen. Raphael Warnock (D) and his challenger Herschel Walker (R) remains critical for the party.

Democrats have attained 50 seats in the Senate, which — along with Vice President Kamala Harris’s tie-breaking vote — technically means they’ll run the Senate chamber no matter what. But a 50-50 split still comes with significant limitations.

Certain rules in the Senate do not hinge on the vice president’s tie-breaking vote, and thus require the establishment of a power-sharing agreement when there is a split chamber. That was the case in early 2021, when Democrats and Republicans agreed that all committees would include an equal number of members from both parties, as opposed to the party in power having slightly more seats in each committee.

If Warnock loses his reelection bid to Walker next month, Democrats will have picked up one Senate seat in the midterms but also lost one seat, meaning that the power-sharing agreement will likely be extended through 2025. If Warnock wins, however, Democrats will have 51 seats in the Senate, meaning that the arrangement will no longer be necessary.

If the 50-50 split becomes a 51-49 majority favoring Democrats, this would open up opportunities for the party to pursue President Joe Biden’s agenda, as well as to hold former President Donald Trump accountable.

The current power-sharing agreement resulted in Republicans blocking a commission to investigate the January 6 Capitol attack, which is why the investigation was taken up by the House of Representatives. Republicans will likely control the House next year and end the commission’s work — but with the power-sharing agreement out of the way, Democrats in the Senate could theoretically establish a new committee on the Capitol attack, or have one of the standing committees investigate, picking up the work of the House select committee.

An extra Democratic seat in the Senate would also make it harder for Republicans to move to impeach Biden in that chamber.

“A Democratic victory in the Georgia run-off is hugely important because a 51-49 does not require power-sharing — which Democrats will want if a Republican House pursues impeachment and other wastes of time and money,” wrote political writer Nicco Mele.

Having 51 Senate seats instead of 50 would mean that Democrats wouldn’t be as beholden to right-wing Senators Kyrsten Sinema (D-Arizona) and Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia), who have blocked numerous Democratic proposals over the past two years.

With one additional Senate seat in their column, Democrats could worry less about the 2024 senatorial elections, when they and their independent allies will have to defend 23 seats total, as opposed to Republicans, who will only have to defend 10 seats.

Biden has stressed the importance of the Georgia runoff race for Democrats.

“It’s always better with 51, because we’re in a situation where you don’t have to have an even makeup of the committee … But it’s just simply better,” Biden said at a recent press conference. “The bigger the numbers, the better.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.