Skip to content Skip to footer

Human Rights Groups Sue to Block Biden’s “Unlawful” Asylum Ban

Biden has “chosen to resurrect and repackage illegal Trump-era policies,” one immigrant advocate said.

Immigrants walk along the border wall to turn themselves over to U.S Border Patrol agents along the U.S.-Mexico border on May 11, 2023, in San Luis Río Colorado, Sonora.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and immigrant advocacy organizations have filed a legal challenge to the Biden administration’s new asylum ban, which went into effect after Title 42 — a pandemic-era emergency policy that was widely condemned by immigrant advocatesexpired on Thursday.

Biden’s asylum ban combines unlawful Trump-era “third country transit ban” policies — which Biden had claimed to be opposed to during his campaign — with additional asylum restrictions that have previously been found to violate due process rights.

“The Biden administration has had over two years to set up a fair and humane asylum process post-Title 42. That it has instead chosen to resurrect and repackage illegal Trump-era policies is reprehensible,” said Melissa Crow, director of litigation at the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies (CGRS).

Under this policy shift, people who are not from Mexico who are seeking asylum at the border will generally be ineligible for asylum. A factsheet on the rule by the organization Human Rights First details that this policy violates U.S. law and treaty obligations and will fuel race- and nationality-based discrimination, exacerbate the family separation crisis, and return refugees to countries where they face poverty, persecution and violence.

“It is a profound shift for a Democratic president to implement a new ban on asylum-seekers,” said Andrea Flores, who served as a White House border official in the first year of the Biden administration. “It’s evidence that the past decade of far-right attacks on Black and brown asylum seekers have significantly weakened the Democratic Party’s commitment to providing refuge to people fleeing persecution and torture.”

Tens of thousands of individuals and organizations, including the ACLU, submitted public comments on the policy, urging the Biden administration to not enact the ban.

“President Biden just ushered in a new period of immense suffering for people already enduring violence and persecution,” said Jonathan Blazer, director of border strategies at the ACLU. “He has closed off the possibility of asylum in the United States to the majority of people seeking safety — in contradiction with our nation’s laws and values. In doing so, he is finishing Trump’s job rather than fulfilling his own campaign promises.”

The policy has also been condemned by progressives in the Democratic party, who have said that the ban is not only extreme but illegal.

“By almost imitating a Trump-era asylum ban the Biden Administration is attempting to implement an extreme immigration policy that is not supported by U.S. law,” said Rep. Jamaal Bowman (New York) on Twitter.

“Seeking asylum is a fundamental human right,” said Rep. Rashida Tlaib (Michigan). “This repackaged Trump-era policy will put countless lives at risk. No human is illegal.”

The ACLU challenge to the rule argues that U.S. courts have previously held that similar bans restricting access to asylum based on an individual’s manner of entry have been ruled unconstitutional and that requiring asylum seekers to use a mobile app to secure an appointment to seek asylum is woefully inadequate.

“The Biden administration’s new ban places vulnerable asylum seekers in grave danger and violates U.S. asylum laws. We’ve been down this road before with Trump,” said Katrina Eiland, managing attorney with the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project. “The asylum bans were cruel and illegal then, and nothing has changed now.”

The Biden administration has also reduced the amount of time that asylum seekers have to find and consult attorneys before their crucial first “credible fear” interview. Migrants who fail to convince officials that there is a “significant possibility” that they will be persecuted if forced to return to their home country are deported.

“The decision to cut the time makes it clear that the Biden administration is doing everything possible to fast-track people for deportation as opposed to giving them the opportunity to truly access due process and a fair chance to have their asylum claim adjudicated,” Taylor Levy, an immigration attorney, told The Los Angeles Times.

The Trump administration issued a similar policy in 2019, but it was later blocked by a federal judge.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.