Skip to content Skip to footer

How Wall Street Drives Gender and Race Pay Gaps

The rapid increase in Wall Street bonuses over the past several decades has contributed to gender and racial inequality.

The total 2018 Wall Street bonus pool was $27.5 billion — more than three times the combined annual earnings of all U.S. full-time minimum wage workers.

Bonuses were down last year in the New York-based securities industry, according to just-released data from the New York State Comptroller. But the average end of year payout in this lucrative and overwhelmingly white and male sector is still dramatically higher than in decades past, while pay in low-wage jobs with greater workforce diversity has stagnated.

Wall Street Pay v. the Minimum Wage

  • The total bonus pool for 181,300 New York City-based Wall Street employees was $27.5 billion — more than 3 times the combined annual earnings of all 640,000 U.S. workers employed full-time (at least 35 hours) at the federal minimum wage.
  • Since 1985, the average Wall Street bonus has increased 1,000 percent, from $13,970 to $153,700. If the minimum wage had increased at that rate, it would be worth $33.51 today, instead of $7.25.

  • These bonuses come on top of salary and other forms of compensation. The CEOs of the top 5 U.S. investment banks hauled in an average of $24.7 million in total compensation in 2018.
Sources: Corporate 8-K reports and proxy statements.
Sources: Corporate 8-K reports and proxy statements.

Wall Street Bonuses and Gender Inequality

The rapid increase in Wall Street bonuses over the past several decades has contributed to gender inequality, since workers at the bottom of the wage scale are predominantly female, while the financial industry is overwhelmingly male, particularly at the upper echelons.

  • The CEOs of the five largest U.S. investment banks are all white men, and the share of their senior executives and top managers who are male ranges from 68-80 percent. (JPMorgan Chase: 74%, Goldman Sachs: 78%, Bank of America Merrill Lynch: 68%, Morgan Stanley: 80%, and Citigroup: 68%)
  • Securities industry employees are 1 percent male nationally, and more than two-thirds male in New York City.
  • By contrast, men make up just 37 percent of the 1.8 million Americans who are working either full- or part-time at the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour.

Wall Street Bonuses and Racial Inequality

The rapid increase in Wall Street bonuses over the past several decades has also contributed to racial inequality. People of color are disproportionately represented in jobs that pay less than $15 per hour, while the lucrative financial industry is overwhelmingly white.

  • At the five largest U.S. investment banks, the share of executives and top managers who are white ranges from 77.9 to 84.3 percent. (JPMorgan Chase: 3%, Goldman Sachs: 80.4%, Bank of America Merrill Lynch: 83.5%, Morgan Stanley: 84.2%, and Citigroup: 77.9%)
  • Securities industry employees are 9 percent white nationally, and more than two-thirds white in New York City.
  • By contrast, whites make up only 4 percent of people in jobs that pay less than $15 per hour, according to a 2016 National Employment Law Project report.

Washington Inaction on Wall Street Pay and Minimum Wage

Since 2010, the year the Dodd-Frank financial reform became law, regulators have failed to implement that law’s Wall Street pay restrictions and Congress has failed to raise the minimum wage. These two failures speak volumes about who has influence in Washington — and who does not.

Powerful Wall Street lobbyists have succeeded in blocking Section 956 of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation, which prohibits financial industry pay packages that encourage “inappropriate risks.” Regulators were supposed to implement this new rule within nine months of the law’s passage but have dragged their feet — despite widespread recognition that these bonuses encouraged the high-risk behaviors that led to the 2008 financial crisis, costing millions of Americans their homes and livelihoods.

In 2011, regulators issued a proposed rule that did not go far enough to prevent the type of behavior that led to the 2008 crash. As spelled out in detail in Institute for Policy Studies comments to the SEC, the proposed rule fell short in several areas, including overly lenient bonus deferrals, weak stock-based pay restrictions, and enforcement proposals that leave too much discretion to bank managers. While regulators responded to criticism by agreeing to issue a new proposal, this work was not completed before the end of the Obama administration.

During the Trump administration, regulators have put the issue on a back burner as Republicans have maneuvered to get rid of the Wall Street pay restrictions altogether. In 2017, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Financial CHOICE Act, which would’ve repealed most of the Dodd-Frank reform package, including the Wall Street pay provision. Due to Democratic opposition in the Senate, a scaled back Wall Street deregulation bill was adopted.

In contrast to the Wall Street lobbyists, advocates for the working poor have been ignored by the majority of U.S. lawmakers in their calls for a raise in the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour. According to the Economic Policy Institute, this hike would directly benefit 28.1 million workers.

Due to Washington inaction, the federal minimum wage continues to be a poverty wage, while the reckless bonus culture is alive and well on Wall Street.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.