Skip to content Skip to footer

House Will Vote Tuesday on Removing Confederate Statues From Capitol

The bill faces steep odds of being passed in the evenly divided Senate.

Statues of Jefferson Finis Davis, 2nd left, president of the Confederate States from 1861-1865, and Uriah M. Rose, left, an Arkansas county judge and supporter of the Confederacy, are on display in Statuary Hall inside the U.S. Capitol on June 18, 2020, in Washington, D.C.

Lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives are set to vote Tuesday on a bill that, if enacted, would remove statues of Confederate figures as well as replace the bust of a Supreme Court jurist who authored what is considered one of the worst decisions in the country’s history.

The bill promoted by Democrats calls for the removal of likenesses of Confederate President Jefferson Davis, his vice president John C. Calhoun, and other individuals linked to the Confederacy in Congress’s Statuary Hall.

The bust of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, who penned the antebellum Dred Scott decision in 1857 declaring that Black individuals in the U.S. could not be conferred full citizenship rights, would also be removed and replaced by a bust of Thurgood Marshall, the first Black person to serve on the Supreme Court.

The bill is a repeat of a similar measure pushed by Democrats during the last congressional sessions and which received the additional support of 72 Republicans in the final vote. The bill was defeated, however, by Republican lawmakers with a voice vote in the GOP-controlled Senate at the time.

It is highly likely that the current bill will face similar opposition, as it will require attaining a filibuster-breaking threshold of 60 votes in the evenly divided Senate in order to get passed.

House Majority Whip Rep. James Clyburn (D-South Carolina) said the measure was important, especially following the attack on the Capitol building this year by a mob of loyalists to former President Donald Trump, many of whom carried Confederate insignia and battle flags during the rampage.

“On January 6th, we experienced the divisiveness of Confederate battle flags being flown inside the U.S. Capitol. Yet there are still vestiges that remain in this sacred building that glorify people and a movement that embraced that flag and sought to divide and destroy our great country,” Clyburn noted. “This legislation will remove these commemorations from places of honor and demonstrate that as Americans we do not celebrate those who seek to divide us.”

Most Americans, by a slim margin, support removing Confederate statues and monuments that are littered around the United States. An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll last summer found that 51 percent of voters supported doing so, while 47 percent were opposed.

Though the poll highlighted how closely divided Americans were on the issue, there was an overwhelming consensus that something had to be done, as only 16 percent said such monuments should be left alone with no changes to them whatsoever. Thirty-one percent, meanwhile, said that monuments should have a plaque added to them to give them more historical context, while a plurality, 41 percent, said statues should be removed from public spaces and perhaps placed in museums instead.

Defenders of Confederate monuments have made dubious arguments that removing statues or monuments associated with Confederate figures would somehow be akin to erasing history. But as social commentator s.e. smith, writing for Truthout in 2019, has noted, such arguments are deeply flawed.

“Removing statues from display doesn’t silence history — but it does allow them to be presented in better context, allowing people to understand the history of Confederate monuments and the role they played in communities,” smith wrote. “Leaving them installed on public land lends them, and the things they symbolize, an official air — one that lends weight to white supremacists across the country.”

Taking those displays down “won’t magically fix racism or end an intergenerational system of oppression,” smith pointed out, “but it’s a step in the right direction for cities willing to back that decision with a genuine conversation about how to address racial equity.”

Briefly, we wanted to update you on where Truthout stands this month.

To be brutally honest, Truthout is behind on our fundraising goals for the year. There are a lot of reasons why. We’re dealing with broad trends in our industry, trends that have led publications like Vice, BuzzFeed, and National Geographic to make painful cuts. Everyone is feeling the squeeze of inflation. And despite its lasting importance, news readership is declining.

To ensure we stay out of the red by the end of the year, we have a long way to go. Our future is threatened.

We’ve stayed online over two decades thanks to the support of our readers. Because you believe in the power of our work, share our transformative stories, and give to keep us going strong, we know we can make it through this tough moment.

At this moment, we have 24 hours left in our important fundraising campaign, and we still must raise $23,000. Please consider making a donation today.