This article was produced by Sludge, an independent, ad-free investigative news site covering money in politics. Click here to support Sludge.
House Republicans are trying to defund a Biden administration proposal to boost competition in poultry markets that is opposed by a Republican megadonor’s massive chicken company.
The House Appropriations Committee put language in its bill to fund the Department of Agriculture in 2024 that would prohibit the agency from advancing any further with the proposed rule, which is currently in the last stages of being finalized. “None of the funds made available by this or any other Act thereafter may be used to write, prepare, or publish a proposed rule, final rule, or an interim final rule in furtherance of, or otherwise to implement or enforce the proposed rule entitled ‘Transparency in Poultry Grower Contracting Tournaments,’” the bill reads.
The Biden administration proposed the rule last May that would require poultry companies to provide information to contract farmers that would help contract farmers make informed decisions for their businesses, such as details on how they will be compensated and information on the chicks and feed that the company would supply them with. Currently, the big poultry companies in the U.S. control the quality of the chicks and feed they provide to contract farmers, and yet they compensate the farmers through a “tournament system” where they pay less to farmers whose adult chickens come out smaller.
The Republicans’ efforts to stop the rule comes after a poultry company owned by Republican megadonor Ron Cameron launched a campaign to get its contract farmers to help it create the impression that it was strongly opposed throughout the industry. Reuters reported in August 2022 that the company, Mountaire Farms, was pressuring its farmers to sign and submit a form letter to the Department of Agriculture expressing opposition to the rule. Mountaire Farms is the fourth-largest poultry company in the U.S.
Cameron has provided Republicans and pro-Republican super PACs tens of millions of dollars in campaign funding over the years, according to Federal Election Commission records. His largest beneficiary has been the Congressional Leadership Fund, a super PAC endorsed by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) to which he has contributed more than $8.2 million. He has also donated $7 million to the Mitch McConnell-aligned Senate Leadership Fund super PAC, $1.5 million to the Republican National Committee, and nearly $1.2 million to McCarthy’s Take Back the House 2022 joint fundraising committee. In March, Cameron donated $703,700 to McCarthy’s Protect the House 2024 fundraising committee.
A review of comments filed to the Department of Agriculture shows that at least 14 farmers submitted Mountaire’s form letter of opposition to the proposed rule.
The final rule is expected to be published this month, according to the timeline provided on Regulations.gov. The Appropriations Committee is meeting today to markup the Agriculture appropriations bill that would defund the proposed rule.
Cameron has donated $29,000 to the campaigns of Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), the chairman of the Agriculture Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee and the sponsor of the bill that would defund the proposal.
Poultry magnate Cameron was also one of the top donors to super PACs and groups backing Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, giving millions of dollars. The Trump administration loosened oversight of labor practices in the industry, where non-unionized contract work is widespread, by hindering members of the bipartisan National Labor Relations Board and slowing enforcement by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.