Skip to content Skip to footer

House Passes Assault Weapons Ban, First of Its Kind in Decades

Though assault weapons are behind many of the U.S.’s worst mass shootings, the bill likely won’t pass the Senate.

Uvalde and Highland Park mass shootings survivors, families and supporters rally on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., calling for stricter gun controls on July 13, 2022.

On Friday, the House voted to pass a ban on certain military-style assault weapons for the first time in 20 years, legislation that advocates say is crucial to curbing gun violence and mass shootings in the U.S.

The bill passed 217 to 213 in a largely party line vote. Two Republicans, Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania) and Chris Jacobs (New York), voted to pass the bill, while five Democrats, Representatives Henry Cuellar (Texas), Jared Golden (Maine), Vicente Gonzalez (Texas), Kurt Schrader (Oregon) and Ron Kind (Wisconsin) voted against it.

Introduced by Democrats in March, the bill, simply titled the Assault Weapons Ban, would ban the sale, transfer, manufacturing and importing of 205 military-style assault weapons, including the AR-15-style semiautomatic guns that gun reform activists point out are the gun of choice of mass shooters. The bill would still allow the ownership of such guns, however.

President Joe Biden has urged the Senate to pass the bill so he can sign it into law. “The majority of the American people agree with this common sense action,” he said. He added that the Senate should “move quickly to get this bill to my desk.”

In a statement of administration policy — a stronger version of a simple public statement — the Biden administration pointed to evidence that an assault weapons ban would likely save lives.

“We know an assault weapons and large-capacity magazine ban will save lives,” the statement said, noting that then-Senator Biden was key in passing the 1994 assault weapons ban, signed by President Bill Clinton, that was in effect for a decade. “For those ten years, mass shootings declined. When the ban expired in 2004, mass shootings tripled.”

However, the bill would need at least 10 Republicans and all Democrats on board to pass in the Senate, which is unlikely, as House Republicans were unified in their opposition to the bill.

Data does show that gun violence and mass shootings markedly declined during the decade of the assault weapons ban, but lawmakers allowed it to expire after 10 years.

Now, semiautomatic guns are easier to obtain than ever, and are increasingly used in mass shootings. Evidence suggests that mass shootings in which the shooter used a semiautomatic gun were more deadly — not just because of the large amount of rounds the guns are capable of shooting in a short period of time, but also because many assault rifles shoot with a level of propulsion that gives bullets an explosive power to shred through organs and tissue.

“These military-style weapons are designed to kill the most people in the shortest amount of time,” Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-New York) said during the debate on the bill. “Quite simply, there is no place for them in our streets.”

Democrats and progressives celebrated the passage of the bill. “Along with so many colleagues and advocates, we fought long and hard to get the assault weapons ban the stand alone vote it deserved,” wrote Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) on Twitter. “This is a victory.”

In a hearing last week, Ocasio-Cortez confronted gun industry figures about their use of white supremacist imagery in their ads, pointing out the deep ties between the far right and the gun industry.

Gun lobbyists have spent millions opposing gun control laws, and the ability to sell assault weapons is lucrative for gun manufacturers. The House Oversight Committee found in a report released last week that major gun companies have received over $1 billion from assault weapons sales over the past decade, with many companies doubling or tripling their revenue in recent years.

The same major companies that have profited from these sales have manufactured the guns behind many of the deadliest mass shootings in modern U.S. history.

For instance, gun manufacturer Daniel Defense, which tripled its revenue from AR-15-style weapons from $40 million to $120 million between 2019 and 2021, made the gun used by the shooter who killed 19 children and two teachers in Uvalde, Texas. The company also made four of the guns in the arsenal of the shooter who killed 60 and injured more than 850 in Las Vegas in 2017, the most deadly modern mass shooting.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.