Tegucigalpa, Honduras and Santiago, Chile – Honduras’s Congress rejected the return of President Manuel Zelaya, polarizing residents in the country who disagree on whether the move ends – or prolongs indefinitely – the political crisis in the Honduran nation.
“Things are finally ending,” says Luis Espinal, a technician in Tegucigalpa, who says keeping Mr. Zelaya out of the presidency means the country can start to look past the crisis.
But Ada Ojullo, a nurse, says this means that coup leaders have won the struggle for political control and hurt the country’s standing. “I don’t know if the political crisis will ever end,” she says.
The Honduran Congress was voting on whether Zelaya – who was ousted from office June 28 by the military for pushing plans to hold a vote to consider a constituent assembly – could be temporarily reinstated to office. His foes, like Mr. Espinal, feared Zelaya was attempting to drop term limits for presidents to prolong his rule, as has his ally Hugo Chávez in Venezuela. Zelaya denies the charge.
The Honduran congressional vote was part of a US-sponsored plan to bring an end to the crisis. Zelaya, who is still holed up in the Brazilian embassy, and Roberto Micheletti, the interim president, both agreed to these terms – in exchange for the US recognizing the presidential election held last Sunday.
A majority of Congressmen agreed Wednesday to reject Zelaya’s return to serve out the last few weeks of his presidential term.
Many Hondurans had hoped that elections would bring an end to a crisis, in which nations suspended international aid. While the US has said it will recognize the elections, in which opposition conservative candidate Porfirio Lobo won the race, most nations in Latin America say they refuse to budge.
The rejection of Zelaya’s temporary return by the Honduran Congress is likely to harden international positions.
After the vote, Zelaya vowed to continue fighting against his ouster. “I call on the people to keep fighting the dictatorship,” Zelaya said on local Radio Globo Tuesday evening.
It is still unclear what his next step will be. He snuck back into Honduras and sought refuge in the Brazilian embassy. Both sides had rejected amnesty, and authorities have promised that Zelaya will be arrested should he step outside.
His supporters say this is the real blow was against the constitution – not Zelaya’s attempt to hold a constituent assembly. Arturo Herrera, a school teacher, says voters elected Zelaya to serve out his term, which would have ended in January. The vote by Congress Wednesday “didn’t solve anything,” he says.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy