It’s been around 10 months since the FBI executed a search warrant at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, obtaining thousands of government documents in the process, including more than 100 marked “classified.” And since that time, support for Trump’s action among Republican voters has significantly diminished.
Days after the FBI operation — which came about following the Department of Justice (DOJ) discovering evidence that Trump had misled them in a previous subpoena, falsely stating he had returned all of the classified documents that he had improperly removed from the White House — an Economist/YouGov poll found that a majority of Americans (54 percent) disapproved of Trump’s holding on to the official documents after he had left office. But within that poll, a majority of Republican voters (53 percent) actually said they approved of what Trump had done.
The Economist/YouGov poll repeated the question in its most recent survey, published on Wednesday and conducted after Trump was indicted over his handling of the documents and obstructing their proper return to the U.S. government. And the results of the poll, among Republicans, are now completely different.
Within the new poll, a majority of Americans overall (63 percent) still disapprove of Trump’s actions relating to this issue, with less than a quarter (24 percent) saying they approve of it. Republicans, meanwhile, are now split on the matter — 39 percent say they approve of Trump’s handling of government documents, while 40 percent now say they disapprove.
The change represents an 11-point increase in Republican voters’ disapproval rating for Trump improperly holding thousands of government materials, and a 14-point drop in their approval rating of the action.
Among those who said they voted for Trump in 2020, the drop is not as significant but it’s still noticeable. When news of the FBI search first appeared, 53 percent of Trump voters said they backed him taking and keeping documents at his residence, with just 26 percent saying they felt it was wrong. Today, however, according to the latest Economist/YouGov numbers, 45 percent say they still support his actions while 36 percent say they don’t.
Given how close the last two elections were, any drop in support for Trump on a number of issues — including this one — is likely to worry the 2024 GOP frontrunner for president. Indeed, among the electorate overall, a Yahoo News/YouGov poll conducted late last month (prior to news of Trump’s indictment) found that 62 percent of voters believed Trump being charged with a “serious crime” should disqualify him from the presidency.
Trump can run for office, even if he’s charged or even successfully convicted of a crime prior to the 2024 election, as there are no such conditions within the U.S. Constitution forbidding someone from running for office after a conviction. But having that many voters believe he should be disqualified from office will likely hurt his chances, in a huge way, in the 2024 general election campaign.
Trump was charged with 37 counts of criminal wrongdoing relating to his keeping documents at Mar-a-Lago after his presidency ended, including charges relating to his holding onto sensitive government materials as well as his obstructing efforts by the DOJ and the National Archives and Records Administration to have them returned. Trump appeared in a Miami, Florida, federal court on Tuesday, where one of his lawyers, speaking on his behalf, pleaded not guilty.
Most voters agree with the decision to charge Trump, with the latest Economist/YouGov poll finding that 52 percent of Americans say the decision to charge him was the right one for the DOJ to take, and only 36 percent disapproving of the decision.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.