Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R) called for an end to two-round runoff elections in the state on Wednesday, saying that the system in its current form is burdensome for voters.
Georgia law requires candidates in state-run elections to achieve a majority vote in order to win office. If no candidate can do so, the two candidates with the highest vote totals move on to a runoff round that takes place four weeks after the original Election Day.
The state has had three high profile runoff elections in the past two years, two senatorial races in the 2020 campaign season and one senatorial race in this year’s midterms — all of which were significant in determining political outcomes in Washington D.C.
“Georgia is one of the only states in the country with a General Election Runoff. We’re also one of the only states that always seems to have a runoff,” Raffensperger said on Wednesday.
The runoffs cause the campaigns to extend into the holiday season, particularly Thanksgiving — something that can be annoying to residents of the state. “No one wants to be dealing with politics in the middle of their family holiday,” said Raffensperger, who is the highest ranking elections official in Georgia.
Raffensperger also noted in his statement that elections were tough “on the counties who had a difficult time completing all of their deadlines, an election audit and executing a runoff in a four-week time period.”
“I’m calling on the [state] General Assembly to visit the topic of the General Election Runoff and consider reforms,” he added.
Raffensperger did not indicate the reforms he had in mind, but a spokesperson for him suggested three alternatives, according to reporting from NBC News. The runoff could be replaced, for example, by an instant runoff system, wherein voters rank all the candidates on a ballot for a particular race. If no candidate receives a majority vote in the first round, the candidate with the least amount of votes is removed from the count and their votes go to voters’ second choice, with the process repeating until someone receives a majority.
The spokesperson for Raffensperger also suggested that the state could lower the threshold a candidate needs to win office — instead of requiring a majority, the state could require a high plurality of votes, as it did briefly in the 1990s through the early 2000s. Another option could be eliminating third-party candidates from automatic ballot access, the spokesperson suggested.
The runoff system as it currently works in Georgia dilutes the voting power of residents from marginalized communities by requiring them to come to the polls twice in order to support their preferred candidate. Indeed, when the runoff system was originally introduced, it was done so with the specific purpose of diluting the power of Black voters in the state.
Some voting rights advocates have questioned Raffensperger’s intentions, as his comments come weeks after Republican senatorial candidate Herschel Walker lost to Democratic incumbent Senator Raphael Warnock.
“Raffensperger was fine with run-offs when the GOP used them as a racist tool to disenfranchise Black voters. He supported shortening the time period 2021 — when it looked like it would help the GOP win. Now that Warnock won, he wants them ended,” tweeted Marc Elias, founder of the voting rights group Democracy Docket.
Still, some election officials agreed that the process of holding two elections so close together is burdensome for voters.
“A four week turnaround from a general election to a general runoff is an almost impossible task,” said Cobb County Elections Supervisor Janine Eveler.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy