Skip to content Skip to footer

George Santos Is Not Running for Reelection After Scathing House Ethics Report

Santos “blatantly stole from his campaign,” ethics investigators found.

Rep. George Santos talks during a break in a House Republican caucus meeting at the Longworth House Office Building on October 13, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

Rep. George Santos (R-New York) has announced that he will not seek reelection to the House after a damning House Ethics Committee report released on Thursday found “substantial evidence” of improprieties concerning his campaign finances, including findings that he “blatantly stole” campaign funds.

The long-awaited 56-page report, prepared by Ethics investigators, lays out a number of findings, including that Santos carried out fraudulent activities both in the solicitation of donations for his campaign and in allegedly using those funds for his own personal benefit.

“Representative Santos’ lies go far beyond inaccuracies on a resume. The [Investigative Subcommittee]’s investigation revealed a complex web of unlawful activity involving Representative Santos’ campaign, personal, and business finances,” the report says.

“Representative Santos sought to fraudulently exploit every aspect of his House candidacy for his own personal financial profit,” it continued. “He blatantly stole from his campaign. He deceived donors into providing what they thought were contributions to his campaign but were in fact payments for his personal benefit. He reported fictitious loans to his political committees to induce donors and party committees to make further contributions to his campaign — and then diverted more campaign money to himself as purported ‘repayments’ of those fictitious loans.”

It is likely that Santos and his campaign operation violated federal law numerous times, House investigators found.

The report details alleged improprieties like Santos using campaign funds for botox, other cosmetic procedures, and trips to places like Las Vegas and Atlantic City. It also presents evidence that Santos formed a firm to supposedly help with the campaign that actually funneled him tens of thousands of dollars — money that investigators found was spent on paying personal credit card bills and debt, an over $4,000 purchase at Hermes, smaller purchases at makeup company Sephora, and OnlyFans, an online platform largely used for adult content.

Ethics investigators additionally found that Santos’s financial disclosure in 2020, the first year he ran for Congress, was incomplete and not an accurate representation of his finances. Meanwhile, his 2021 and 2023 financial disclosures are missing completely, and his 2022 financial disclosure was three months late and full of “errors and omissions,” the report notes.

The report additionally notes that, during their investigation, Santos failed to produce financial records backing up some of his claims to the subcommittee, and was also generally uncooperative with the investigation. The report says that it is likely that he “knowingly and willfully failed” to provide complete information on his financial disclosures.

Santos announced in a statement shortly after the report’s release that he is not seeking reelection because “my family deserves better than to be under the gun from the press all the time.” He called the report “biased” and a “disgusting politicized smear.”

This comes after two major staff members for Santos’s campaign have pleaded guilty in a sprawling federal case against the lawmaker involving campaign finance fraud. On Tuesday, former Santos fundraiser Sam Miele pleaded guilty to a federal count of wire fraud. Miele had impersonated a staffer for a member of Congress — widely believed to be then-chief of staff for former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-California) Dan Meyer, as reporters have found — in an attempt to solicit donations for Santos’s campaign.

And, last month, the former campaign treasurer for Santos, Nancy Marks, pleaded guilty to felony charges regarding a fraudulent $500,000 loan to the campaign as part of an apparent scheme to inflate the campaign’s fundraising numbers.

Some House lawmakers have said that it is likely they will move to expel Santos following the release of the report. House Republican leaders had previously said that they wouldn’t act until the Ethics Committee found wrongdoing, and an effort to expel Santos earlier this month failed in a split vote, with many Republicans and Democrats voting not to expel him.

Since then, however, numerous lawmakers who previously voted “no” or “present” on the issue have said that they are now going to vote to expel Santos.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy