Tempers flared in the halls of Congress on Tuesday as former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-California) appeared to jab in the back a fellow GOP congressman who voted for his ouster last month.
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tennessee) was speaking to NPR reporter Claudia Grisales in the U.S. Capitol when the incident occurred. Grisales recounted the series of events on her account on X, the site formerly known as Twitter.
“While talking to @RepTimBurchett after the GOP conference meeting, former @SpeakerMcCarthy walked by with his detail and McCarthy shoved Burchett,” Grisales wrote, adding that she “thought it was a joke” but that “it was not.”
Burchett, confused about what had just happened, yelled at McCarthy. “Why’d you elbow me in the back, Kevin?” he said, before chasing the former speaker down the hallway. Burchett asked if McCarthy had “any guts” to discuss the matter with him, as McCarthy, who was accompanied by a security detail, continued walking without acknowledging the Tennessee congressman.
Finally, McCarthy responded to Burchett’s words, rejecting his claims that he had hit him.
“I didn’t elbow you in the back,” he said.
Burchett, responding to McCarthy’s denial, said that he had “no guts” and called the elbowing a “chicken move.”
Later, Burchett told Grisales that the interaction on Tuesday between him and McCarthy was the first time the two have had a “communication” since the vote to remove the California lawmaker from the speakership position.
Burchett recounted the interaction on CNN later that day, describing Grisales’s account on X as “very accurate.”
“I turned back and there was Kevin,” Burchett said, describing the elbowing in an interview on the cable network. “For a minute, I was kinda ‘What the heck just happened?’ I chased after him.”
Burchett derided McCarthy as “a bully” with security detail.
“You just don’t expect a guy who was at one time three steps away from the White House to hit you with a sucker punch in the hallway,” Burchett said.
Burchett said he didn’t intend to file an ethics complaint against McCarthy over the incident. But later on Tuesday, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Florida), whose distaste for McCarthy (and vice versa) is well documented, filed a complaint of his own against the former speaker.
“This incident deserves immediate and swift investigation by the Ethics Committee,” Gaetz’s complaint states.
Notably, Burchett was one of eight Republicans who voted to oust McCarthy in early October. With every Democrat in the chamber also voting in favor of removing McCarthy, the motion to vacate successfully passed, leading to weeks of no leadership. During that time, two formal nominations from Republicans failed before far right Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana was selected and eventually voted in.
Johnson has until the end of this week to pass a stopgap funding bill in the House in order to avert a government shutdown. The interaction between McCarthy and Burchett is perhaps emblematic of the difficulties the new House speaker faces in cajoling members of his party into supporting a bill — members of the far right House Freedom Caucus, for example, have already stated that they will oppose the measure, which is now forcing Johnson into the precarious position of having to ask Democrats in the chamber to help him pass it, an action that Freedom Caucus members cited in justifying their support for originally removing McCarthy.
Although they oppose the federal funding measure, the Freedom Caucus has stated that it will not use this vote to attempt to remove Johnson from his role as speaker.
“While we remain committed to working with Speaker Johnson, we need bold change,” the group said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.