Sony’s gaming subsidiary, Sony Interactive Entertainment, entered the lobbying world late last year expressing concerns about competition in the video game industry pending Microsoft’s $69 billion acquisition of gaming developer Activision Blizzard — the biggest gaming deal in history.
Sony Interactive Entertainment reported lobbying Congress for the first time in the fourth quarter of 2022, spending $60,000 to influence policy. It spent an additional $240,000 in the first half of 2023 lobbying federal lawmakers, the Department of Commerce and the U.S. Trade Representative in support of antitrust law enforcement, according to the company’s lobbying disclosures.
Activision Blizzard ramped up its typical lobbying activity this year, hiring a firm that reported lobbying Congress on “gaming competition” last quarter as well as the “adjudication of workforce issues.” The game publisher increased its total number of lobbyists from seven in 2022 to 16 in 2023, and 88% of the lobbyists it hired in 2023 were “revolving door” former federal employees.
After pausing its lobbying in 2020, Activision Blizzard steadily increased its lobbying each quarter since the first three months of 2022, when Microsoft announced the acquisition. Lawmakers asked the Federal Trade Commission in March 2022 to investigate how the merger would affect Activision Blizzard’s workers, as it had just settled a U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission lawsuit alleging gender-based harassment and discrimination for $18 million.
Activision Blizzard spent $420,000 on lobbying in the first six months of 2023, which is on track to outpace its 2022 spending. Throughout 2022, Activision Blizzard spent $520,000 on federal lobbying, mostly on bills that aimed to make the U.S. technology sector more competitive with China. In the first half of 2023, the game publisher paid to lobby federal lawmakers on labor policy as well as the Executive Office of the President about the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Microsoft, producer of Xbox gaming consoles and exclusive owner of the Halo series, has lobbied heavily on antitrust and competition issues this year. Microsoft reported spending $4.5 million on federal lobbying in the first six months of 2023, after spending $4.8 million in the last six months of 2022, excluding subsidiary LinkedIn’s lobbying expenditures. Microsoft is the third-biggest spender within the electronics manufacturing and equipment industry, after Oracle Corporation and Apple.
The FTC sued to block the merger in June 2023, but a federal appeals court denied the FTC’s motion to stop the deal.
Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick told Fox Business on July 19 that the federal court’s refusal to stop the acquisition shows “the law is on our side for this transaction,” adding “Sony and Nintendo don’t need protection from the American Federal Trade Commission.”
The companies have cleared all remaining U.S. regulatory hurdles, but agencies abroad have held up the deal. To make time to resolve outstanding international regulatory concerns, the companies extended the deal’s deadline from July to October.
On Aug. 7, the New Zealand Commerce Commission approved Microsoft‘s proposed acquisition of Activision, leaving Australia and the United Kingdom as the final holdouts.
The U.K.’s Competition and Markets Authority released a February report that expressed concerns the acquisition could lead to fewer choices and higher prices for gamers. Sony told the agency in March it would lose revenue in subscriptions and PlayStation console purchases if Microsoft made Call of Duty exclusive to Xbox.
But the agency’s March 24 report stated that, with new data provided by acquisition parties and industry third parties, it found Microsoft would face significant financial losses if it made that decision. Sony said the agency’s reversal was “surprising, unprecedented and irrational.”
The U.K. agency also cited the fact Microsoft had not made previous acquisitions, like Minecraft, exclusive to Xbox consoles, to argue that the merger was not as dangerous to console competition as it previously thought. The agency announced it would continue investigating the acquisition’s effects on competition in the emerging cloud-gaming market and blocked the deal on those grounds in April.
After the European Union approved the merger in May, and U.S. federal courts rejected the FTC’s request to stop the deal in July, the U.K. agency opened up comments again about the merger. Microsoft asked the agency July 31 for the agency to reconsider the decision, stating it had reached a 10-year deal with Sony, “the principal opponent of the transaction,” to keep Call of Duty games available on PlayStation consoles, in addition to reaching licensing agreements with various cloud-gaming services.
The July agreement between Microsoft and Sony might signal the end of industry infighting, putting the deal one step closer to finishing once and for all in October.
Editorial and Investigations Manager Anna Massoglia contributed to this report.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.