Republicans in the Florida legislature have proposed ending the requirement for unanimous jury recommendations in capital murder cases before a person can be sentenced to death by the state.
Such a requirement didn’t exist until 2016, when the federal Supreme Court ruled that majority-based recommendations to judges on the death penalty gave too much power to judges. The state legislature reacted swiftly to that ruling, passing a new law allowing judges to sentence people to death if 10 out of 12 jurors agreed on the matter, but the state Supreme Court found that law unconstitutional as well, stating in late 2016 that unanimous jury decisions were needed to impose a death sentence.
Since then, however, the state Supreme Court has undergone a dramatic rightward shift, largely as a result of appointments by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, who took office in 2019. In 2020, the state Supreme Court overruled its previous decision, finding that unanimous juries weren’t needed (though it kept the requirement in place for the time being, saying that the state legislature would have to actively pass a new law in order to enact the change).
Justice Jorge Labarga, who dissented in that case, called it “a giant step backward,” and a removal of “a significant safeguard for the just application of the death penalty in Florida.”
This week, state Rep. Berny Jacques (R) and state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia (R) introduced similar bills in their respective houses of the state legislature that would only require eight out of 12 jurors to recommend a death penalty sentence to a judge, just one week after DeSantis signaled support for such a change.
The Florida governor, speaking before the Florida Sheriffs Association, said that he wanted to see a system where a “super-majority” of jurors would decide on the death penalty, rather than a unanimous jury. “Maybe eight out of 12 or something,” he said.
Since the federal reintroduction of the death penalty in 1976, Florida has executed 99 people. But DNA and other post-trial evidence have exonerated around 30 people during that same time period — an alarming statistic that suggests that, for every three executions the state carries out, one person has been wrongly convicted.
It’s likely that the state will put more people to death in the coming years. Florida currently has 323 people sitting on death row — more than any other state besides California, which has a moratorium on the death penalty.
Sister Helen Prejean, an advocate for abolishing the death penalty, reacted to DeSantis’s call for lowering the threshold needed to sentence someone in Florida to death.
“Given all the problems, errors, and injustices in the criminal legal system, making it easier to impose a death sentence is a very bad idea,” Prejean said in a tweet. “If prosecutors can’t convince a jury to vote for death, perhaps the solution is to end capital punishment rather than change the rules.”
An organization called Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty also spoke out against state-sanctioned executions. “Florida’s Death Penalty is broken. It’s time to end it,” the group said in a tweet, just a few hours after the bill to change death penalty standards was submitted in the state House of Representatives.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.