Skip to content Skip to footer

Federal Judge Extends Statewide His Previous Order Blocking Florida’s Drag Ban

“The statute is facially unconstitutional,” and “must extend to protect all Floridians,” the judge ruled.

Salem Sanderson wears a cape that reads "Drag is Not a Crime" as she performs during the Miss Gay Days Pageant at the DoubleTree by Hilton Orlando at SeaWorld on June 3, 2023, in Orlando, Florida.

A federal judge has rebuked efforts by the state of Florida to block an injunction on the state’s ban on drag show performances.

The order from U.S. District Judge Gregory Presnell on Wednesday means Florida officials are now barred from enforcing a ban on venues that host drag shows in places where children may be present or nearby, pending the outcome of a lawsuit from one restaurant in the state that argues such a ban is unconstitutional.

In June, Presnell placed a stay on the ban, which was signed into law by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) earlier this year.

Presnell blocked enforcement of the law after a restaurant that regularly hosts drag shows, Hamburger Mary’s in Orlando, filed a lawsuit alleging that the ban was overly broad and that it placed a chilling effect on First Amendment speech rights. The restaurant’s lawsuit stated that the law “prohibits protected speech based on the identity of the speaker” and wrongly targets drag shows that have become “part of mainstream culture.”

In a Facebook post in May, the restaurant noted that the ban was part of DeSantis’s broader attacks against LGBTQ people. “This bill has nothing to do with children, and everything to do with the continued oppression of the LGBTQ+ community,” they said.

Presnell’s June order, which accepted many of the arguments Hamburger Mary’s had made about the vagueness of the law, rejected notions that speech rights should be hampered on the basis that a select number of people might find a performance to be obscene, offensive or otherwise unsuitable for children. Rather, Presnell reminded the state that current laws on obscenity still allow officials to “protect children from any constitutionally unprotected obscene exhibitions or shows.”

The law in question, which barred minors from being able to attend drag shows with supposedly “lewd” performances, was written so broadly that even venues that hosted drag shows without sexual content would likely be affected.

The judge has also acknowledged that the state’s arguments for why the law needs to be enforced are inconsistent with how other state laws are enforced. The law — and arguments by the state that supposedly lewd shows should never be attended by children — “rings hollow when accompanied by the knowledge that Florida state law, presently and independently of the instant statutory scheme, permits any minor to attend an R-rated film at a movie theater if accompanied by a parent or guardian,” Presnell said in his original order last month.

Presnell reiterated this argument in his order this week.

State officials had wanted Presnell’s injunction to apply only to that restaurant, not other venues across the state that were seeking to host drag shows. The state had argued that taking the latter course of action would create a supposed harm to residents and to the state itself, as the statue was passed under the guise of protecting children.

Presnell rejected those arguments, however, noting that greater legal harm would come to those whose First Amendment speech rights would be violated by allowing the law to remain in place pending the lawsuit’s outcome.

Hamburger Mary’s “is not the only party suffering injury as a result of the passage of the Act; it has a chilling effect on all members of society who fall within its reach,” Presnell noted, adding in no uncertain terms that, “the balance of harms weighs heavily in favor of protecting Floridians from this unconstitutional statute.”

“Protecting the right to freedom of speech is the epitome of acting in the public interest,” Presnell concluded in his order broadening the injunction. “It is no accident that this freedom is enshrined in the First Amendment. This injunction protects [Hamburger Mary’s] interests, but because the statute is facially unconstitutional, the injunction necessarily must extend to protect all Floridians.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy