The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) long-overdue quadrennial review of media ownership rules is quickly approaching its most recent deadline as the agency waits on the result of an ongoing court case with several media reform groups.
Every four years, the FCC evaluates rules that regulate ownership of broadcast outlets. The FCC commissioned nine economic studies and held six public workshops in 2009 and 2010 to get input on its regulations, including how to address financial needs and economic changes in the media, industry diversity and the effects of new media on broadcast stations – but a debate on cross-ownership has become the standout issue.
The FCC did not respond to requests for comment.
In 2007, the commission loosened the restrictions on a 35-year-old ban on newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership, giving new allowance for a single company to buy and operate both a major newspaper and a radio or TV station in the same market – a move that was immediately challenged by public interest advocates, including the Prometheus Radio Project and the Media Alliance. With the Third Circuit Court involved, Commissioner Robert McDowell said in April, the FCC would have trouble moving forward with its review.
“As far back as 2009 I was sounding the warning that we needed to be expeditious in addressing these rules,” McDowell told the National Journal. “There is certainly the potential for this regulation and litigation cycle to continue for years.”
Independent journalism is important. Click here to get Truthout stories sent to your email.
The Prometheus Radio Project, which has fought against alleviating cross-ownership restrictions since 2003, was joined by a number of other consumer advocacy groups in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in February to present their challenge against the FCC's new regulations, arguing that loopholes in the commission's rules could allow newspapers to own TV stations of any size. Media reform group Free Press also testified that media consolidation could prevent an increase in minority-owned stations and stifle the creation of local news programs.
“Under [former chairman] Kevin Martin, the FCC attempted to eviscerate the longstanding rules regarding ownership of newspapers and broadcast stations in the same market,” Media Access Project Senior Vice President and Policy Director Andrew Schwartzman, who was representing the Prometheus Radio Project, said at the time. “We welcome the opportunity to call upon the Court to reverse that decision.”
“The current FCC had an opportunity to tighten rules adopted in 2007,” said Free Press policy counsel Corie Wright. “[But] instead the current chairman has chosen to defend them … We hope the court will recognize these deficiencies and instruct the FCC to correct its mistakes.”
McDowell, who supported the FCC's decision to deregulate cross-ownership, asked the court to make a quick decision on the case because of the country's “grave economic situation,” which saw the closing of several major regional newspapers during the recession. While he admitted that the FCC did not need to wait for the court to make a decision on the cross-ownership case before continuing with the quadrennial review, McDowell said it would be “awkward” for the agency to do so.
Compounding the debate over the issue, the FCC gave media companies running both newspapers and TV stations their third deadline to update requests for the waiver of cross-ownership rules; with the July 5 deadline rapidly approaching, the court case pending and the FCC hesitant to move forward without a decision from the judges, it is unclear when the review, currently almost two years in the making, will be completed.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 253 new monthly donors in the next 3 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy