Skip to content Skip to footer

Far Right Republicans Are Considering Ousting McCarthy From Speaker Role

It’s not a matter of if, but when, Freedom Caucus members try to boot McCarthy, sources say.

Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy talks to reporters following a House Republican caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on September 27, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

Amid a government funding crisis that will likely lead to a shutdown this weekend, far right Republicans are reportedly considering ousting Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-California) in favor of leadership that is more agreeable to their demands.

Members of the House Freedom Caucus, which advocates for harsher immigration standards and cuts to social programs, are in the planning stages for removing McCarthy from his speakership role, The Washington Post reported, citing four sources with familiarity of their effort. It’s not clear when the plan will be implemented, but the sources have indicated that they will, at some point, try to push McCarthy out — and that it could happen as soon as next week.

The effort is reportedly being led by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Florida), who has criticized McCarthy’s leadership at several junctures over the past few weeks and has said in public that he may soon seek to remove the Speaker from power.

The group is dissatisfied with the conservative Speaker’s refusal to take a hard right stance on a number of policy items. They also blame him for the current government funding impasse, saying that he wasted several months by refusing to negotiate with them on possible bills that include many of their demands for funding the government, including massive spending cuts; these demands would have no chance of passing the Senate and would be rejected by President Joe Biden.

Freedom Caucus members are perhaps mindful of the fact that one of their own couldn’t garner enough votes from the GOP conference — which only has a five-seat majority in the House — to become Speaker. But one name from current Republican leadership in the House has come up as a potential replacement for McCarthy — Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minnesota), who serves as the party whip in the chamber.

Emmer is not a member of the Freedom Caucus, but would likely be more amenable to their demands than McCarthy. When pressed for comment on the potential ousting of McCarthy, Emmer said he had “zero interest in palace intrigue.”

“I fully support Speaker McCarthy. He knows that and I know that,” Emmer said in a statement to The Post.

The timing of the Freedom Caucus’s plans would put Congress in disarray during a particularly tumultuous time, as there will likely be a shutdown next week due to breakdowns in negotiations over government funding. Much of the issues in negotiating have been internal within the GOP conference, with some Republicans recently calling out their own members over the disagreements.

“This is stupidity, the idea that we’re going to shut the government down when we don’t control the Senate, we don’t control the White House,” Rep. Mike Lawler (R-New York) said last week.

Lawler and at least one other Republican in the House have said they would support a bipartisan solution to reopen the government in the event of a shutdown. Just five Republicans would be needed to do so, though under parliamentary rules this could take weeks to accomplish.

It’s unclear how long a shutdown would take to be resolved, but adding a showdown over the speakership into the mix would invariably lengthen the process, particularly due to the strong likelihood that opposing factions within the GOP would be unable to agree on a name. It took 15 rounds of voting over several days in January for McCarthy himself to win the position, which he was only able to accomplish after agreeing to stipulations imposed by the Freedom Caucus.

Such a scenario would likely hurt Republicans politically. Recent polling indicates that Americans are split on who they’d blame for a potential shutdown, with a recent Economist/YouGov survey showing that 27 percent would fault Biden and Democrats in Congress, while 29 percent would blame Republicans. (Thirty-two percent would blame both parties equally). But if the standoff lasts a while, with GOP infighting prolonging the process, voters would likely shift blame toward Republicans — a precarious position to be in, one year out from the 2024 elections.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.