Part of the Series
Moyers and Company
Faced with a presidential debate season that lacked any real discussion of an issue that the current occupant of the White House, Barack Obama, has identified as a “terrifying” threat, a small but well-connected group of California activists have decided to take matters into their own hands.
They’re building a tool to raise voter awareness about where candidates stand on climate change and they’re focusing their attention not on the White House, but on the institution at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue that’s been most resistant to respond to the problem.
Earlier this month, the group launched Climate Congress, a website that aims to provide basic information on where every incumbent member of the US House and Senate and their challengers stand on key environmental questions. The mostly volunteer team behind the project began with an aim of capturing information on the candidates in the 33 Senate seats that are up for grabs in November’s election as well as candidates for 51 competitive House races where there’s a significant difference between the candidates on climate issues. The site has its own Wiki, allowing for group collaboration on the project, and founders are encouraging the public to fill in missing information.
To see more stories like this, visit Moyers & Company at Truthout.
“Every day we are adding,” says Felix Kramer, a self-described “frustrated climate hawk” who helped get the site off the ground. “We’ve started to get crowdsourced information.” He says he and several allies, including Mike Mielke, who handles environmental issues for the influential Silicon Valley Leadership Group, decided to launch the site after discovering there is no one-stop shop for voters to learn where politicians stand on climate issues.
“The information is scattered around,” says Kramer, who sees that as a “sign that people don’t recognize the urgency and don’t think there is anything they can do.”
The site addresses the latter problem by calling for volunteers to help with a range of chores, from writing and editing to social media promotion. Researchers will help get information to answer three basic questions about each candidate for congressional office:
- What are the individual’s views on whether climate change is real and caused by human activity?
- What votes, actions and governmental/organizational activities on climate change and clean energy has the individual led/supported/opposed?
- What has the individual said about local and regional climate-related impacts and activities?
The effort is unique in its single-mindedness and comprehensiveness (unlike a tool like the League of Conservation Voters congressional scorecard, it focuses solely on climate change, and includes information on challengers). Kramer says he hopes crowdsourcing will keep the site nimble: Rather than waiting for a once-a-year compilation of roll call votes, Climate Congress can update as candidates change positions or make their positions known. And unlike many other environmental groups, Climate Congress is organized as a nonpartisan 501(c)3. That means it can’t make endorsements, though Kramer says “our goal now is to show that what we’ve done so far can have some impact before Nov. 8” by motivating more voters to press candidates on climate change issues.
Already the project has gotten an influential thumbs-up from one of the nation’s best-known environmental activists.
@ClimateCongrss Where do legislators stand on climate? See https://t.co/nlKA3Z74Fi for ALL Senate races & some House. A useful resource!
— Bill McKibben (@billmckibben) October 20, 2016
Kramer, who says he got technical help creating the Wiki from the Wisconsin-based Center for Media and Democracy, encourages voters to adopt the list “bring it to your town hall and ask questions.” He plans to keep the project going well after the Nov. 8 election and hopes that, over time, it will help elect more climate-change-minded senators and representatives.
Finding a gap in the ecosphere and taking it upon himself to plug it is typical for Kramer, a transplanted New Yorker who cut his teeth as an environmental advocate back east. While living in New York City, he says, he became director of now-legendary effort that put a windmill atop a tenement. After heading west to join the California tech rush, founding an internet startup and selling it, Kramer has devoted himself full-time to environmental causes. He drew national attention for CalCars, another DIY venture in which he and some like-minded tinkerers did automakers one better by taking apart a hybrid Prius and remaking it so it could be plugged into an electrical outlet and fitted with a longer-lived battery. The story of Kramer’s efforts earned him a chapter in the 2013 book about the clean energy economy, Apollo’s Fire, co-authored by Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat. Former President Bill Clinton wrote the forward.
Now that automakers are manufacturing the cars of Kramer’s dreams, he has declared victory for CalCars and is looking for a new world to conquer.
Congress is hereby forewarned.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.