Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Encouraging Signs for a Brighter 2014

Paul Krugman: “One way to describe the American economy in 2013 is to say that it was, in effect, trying to begin a strong recovery, but was held back by terrible federal fiscal policy.”

(Image: Van Dam / Landsmeer - Netherlands / CartoonArts International / The New York Times Syndicate)

Did you know that Truthout is a nonprofit and independently funded by readers like you? If you value what we do, please support our work with a donation.

There’s an alarming amount of optimism out there about the United States’ economic prospects for 2014. Let me make the situation even more alarming by saying that I basically share that optimism. Why? Because of the Three Stooges effect: if you’ve been banging your head against a wall for no good reason, you’ll feel a lot better when you stop.

One way to describe the American economy in 2013 is to say that it was, in effect, trying to begin a strong recovery, but was held back by terrible federal fiscal policy. Housing was making a comeback; if state and local austerity policies were not going into reverse, at least they were not getting more intense; and household spending was starting to revive as debt levels came down.

But the feds were raising the payroll tax, slashing spending via the sequester, and more. Incidentally, because of these other factors, I don’t take seriously the claims of market monetarists that the failure of growth to collapse in 2013 somehow shows that fiscal policy doesn’t matter.

Austerity in the United States, although a really bad thing, wasn’t nearly as intense as what happened in Southern Europe; it was restrained enough that it could be – and, I’d argue, was – more or less offset by other developments over the course of a single year.

The point, in any case, is that the head-banging is about to stop – not in a sense that we’ll reverse our move in the wrong direction, but that we won’t keep on moving in that direction. Meanwhile, the housing market is still improving, and other stuff is relatively favorable.

None of this vindicates the multiple years of sluggish recovery that should have been vigorous. And let’s be clear: this kind of forecast is much less reliable than, say, my predictions that inflation and interest rates would stay low in the United States as long as we remained stuck in a liquidity trap, which were grounded in model fundamentals.

Still, the new year starts with some good omens. Oh, and on politics: since Obamacare is a nondisaster and Americans are facing the prospect of a decent rate of economic growth, the midterm congressional elections in November may not go the way that many conservatives currently expect.

What a Good Year Won’t Prove

A brief addendum: If 2014 is a year of relatively good growth, you know that many people will take that as somehow refuting Keynesianism – “Hey, didn’t you guys predict that the economy would never recover without fiscal stimulus?”

No, we didn’t. As I wrote in 2009: “In the long run, we will have a spontaneous economic recovery, even if all current policy initiatives fail. On the other hand, in the long run …” The fact that things eventually get better is neither a refutation of Keynesian analysis, nor a reason to excuse or overlook the vast economic and human costs of the bad policies to date – just as it does not vindicate austerity policies in Britain, either.

Important Message: Please Read

For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.

Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.

As Google plans to roll out its new AI search bar, providing shoddy AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site, the consequences promise to be even more explosive. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which 27 percent of our readers find us. If even half of that 27 percent disappears, it will have a devastating impact on our journalism.

The entire journalism ecosystem will shoulder this blow, particularly independent publishers and news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations. If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the inevitability of Big Tech’s AI takeover. Please give today.