Skip to content Skip to footer
Elena Kagan Will Be Fourth Woman to Join Supreme Court
Losing just one vote from the Democrats

Elena Kagan Will Be Fourth Woman to Join Supreme Court

Losing just one vote from the Democrats

Losing just one vote from the Democrats, the Senate approved Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court, 63-37, Thursday afternoon.

Despite Sen. Ben Nelson’s (D-Nebraska) vote against her nomination, Kagan picked up five Republican backers: Susan Collins, Lindsey Graham, Richard Lugar, Olympia Snowe and Judd Gregg. South Carolina’s Graham was the only Republican member of the Senate Judiciary Committee to support the nominee.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) said the Senate made the right decision.

“Kagan will join a court dominated by conservatives that too often has departed from its best institutional traditions, resulting in unprecedented and sharply divided decisions favoring special interests and big corporations,” Whitehouse said. “I hope that Kagan will help provide a counterbalance to this disturbing trend.”

In a statement, President Obama said since he nominated Kagan to the High Court, the Senate Judiciary Committee has “scrutinized Elena’s record as a scholar, as a law school dean, as a presidential advisor, and as Solicitor General.”

“And after 17 hours of testimony during which she answered more than 540 questions, I’d say they got a pretty good look at Elena Kagan,” Obama said. “They’ve gotten a good sense of her formidable intelligence, her rich understanding of our Constitution, her commitment to the rule of law, and her excellent — and occasionally irreverent — sense of humor. And they have come to understand why, throughout her career, she has earned the respect and admiration of folks from across the political spectrum — an achievement reflected in today’s bipartisan vote.”

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) Kagan displayed a “deep respect for the law” during her confirmation hearings. But he urged her to “resist the drift toward judicial activism that produced the Citizens United decision, overturning a century of jurisprudence to give large corporations too big a voice in our elections.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “It is a true tribute to our heritage of progress and our promise of equality that, when Elena Kagan is sworn in, three women will sit on the Supreme Court for the first time in history.”

The session was not without its barbs. Shortly before the vote, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) enumerated the reasons he felt that Kagan should not be appointed. Among them was her work as an opposition researcher for presidential candidate Michael Dukakis, during which McConnell said it was her job “to attack the Republican opposition.”

McConnell said Kagan’s work with Dukakis was part of “a pattern . . of political activity” that continued to show itself when she worked as an advisor to President Bill Clinton as well as during her time as dean of Harvard Law School.

Unlike last summer’s confirmation hearings for Justice Sonia Sotomayor, this summer’s hearing had no catch phrase. It also lacked a judicial record to critique (though Republicans certainly knocked Kagan’s lack thereof). However, these disadvantages did not leave senators speechless. Among the more contentious issues during the three-day grilling was a Harvard Law School policy that denied military recruiters access to the school’s career center.

The law school uniformly banned employers that discriminated based on factors such as age, race and sexual orientation from using campus facilities. This policy kept recruiters out of the career center. Critics seized on Kagan’s support for the ban.

Senators also used the hearings to rail against current court decisions, assailing the High Court’s verdicts in Citizens United and the Lilly Ledbetter case, and asking how Kagan, as a justice, would have ruled. Like her predecessors’ answers, however, Kagan’s responses revealed little.

Elena Kagan will replace retiring Justice John Paul Stevens who joined the Supreme Court in 1975.

The stakes have never been higher (and our need for your support has never been greater).

For over two decades, Truthout’s journalists have worked tirelessly to give our readers the news they need to understand and take action in an increasingly complex world. At a time when we should be reaching even more people, big tech has suppressed independent news in their algorithms and drastically reduced our traffic. Less traffic this year has meant a sharp decline in donations.

The fact that you’re reading this message gives us hope for Truthout’s future and the future of democracy. As we cover the news of today and look to the near and distant future we need your help to keep our journalists writing.

Please do what you can today to help us keep working for the coming months and beyond.