On Monday, a coalition of education advocacy groups filed a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at dismantling the U.S. Department of Education.
The coalition includes the National Education Association (NEA) — the country’s largest union — the NAACP, several other advocacy organizations, and parents of public school students.
“Nothing is more important than the success of students. America’s educators and parents won’t be silent as Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and [Education Secretary] Linda McMahon try to steal opportunities from our students, our families, and our communities to pay for tax cuts for billionaires,” NEA President Becky Pringle said in a statement. “Gutting the Department of Education will hurt all students by sending class sizes soaring, cutting job training programs, making higher education more out of reach, taking away special education services for students with disabilities, and gutting student civil rights protections.”
Since the beginning of Trump’s second term, his administration has moved steadily toward dismantling the agency. These efforts have included cutting staff and canceling $1.5 billion in contracts and grants tied to congressionally approved programs.
On March 11, McMahon announced a department-wide reduction in force that — when combined with earlier cuts — halved the agency’s staff. Approximately 1,300 employees at the Education Department were notified that they would lose their jobs, including all staff from the Office for Civil Rights in seven of its 12 regional offices.
“Education is power. By firing half of the workforce at the Department of Education, Trump is not only seeking to dismantle an agency — he is deliberately destroying the pathway many Americans have to a better life,” Derrick Johnson, president and CEO of the NAACP, said in a statement.
Then, on March 20, Trump signed an executive order directing McMahon to take all necessary steps to eliminate the Department of Education. Just one day later, he revealed plans to transfer the federal student loan program to the Small Business Administration and move disability-related education programs to the Department of Health and Human Services.
“As a parent of a child with disabilities who has an Individual Education Program (IEP), I am deeply troubled by the severe cuts the Trump Administration has made to the Department of Education,” Maryland parent and lawsuit plaintiff Mara Greengrass said in a statement. “Funding for special education and the Department’s oversight have been crucial in ensuring my son receives the quality education he — and every child in this country — deserves.”
According to the NEA, dismantling the department would jeopardize critical support for millions of students — particularly those from low-income families, English language learners, rural students, and students experiencing homelessness. The move could also endanger more than 400,000 educator jobs, remove oversight of federal education funds, and disrupt services for 7.5 million students with disabilities.
“The Trump administration’s effort to dismantle the Department of Education is not only illegal; it inflicts great harm on students, schools, and communities across the country,” said Robert Kim, executive director of the Education Law Center.
The lawsuit argues that Trump exceeded his constitutional authority by attempting to unilaterally dismantle a federal agency established by Congress, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. “Taken together, Defendants’ steps since January 20, 2025, constitute a de facto dismantling of the Department by executive fiat…. ” the complaint argues. “But the Constitution gives power over ‘the establishment of offices [and] the determination of their functions and jurisdiction’ to Congress — not to the President or any officer working under him.”
In a separate lawsuit filed the same day, the American Federation of Teachers, along with several public school districts and advocacy organizations, also challenged the executive order. Their suit similarly seeks a court ruling to block the order and declare the administration’s actions unlawful.
“This country needs to be focused on how to improve education and opportunities for all and how to support those who both give and receive education with safe, effective, accessible, and quality schools and opportunities,” said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, the legal group representing the plaintiffs. “Yet, instead of doing that, Donald Trump is taking a wrecking ball to our nation’s best values and our chance at a better future.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 24 hours to add 180 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.