Skip to content Skip to footer

Drone Surveillance Is No Longer Just “Over There”

Can we trust Trump or Clinton not to deploy drones against certain individuals or groups or minorities they perceive as adversaries?

Beginning Election Day, Nov. 8, the US drone industry is holding a three-day convention at the former Rome Air Base and at the OnCenter in downtown Syracuse. It happens that Central New York is one of the nation’s main drone research hubs. Not coincidentally our region also hosts the 174th Attack wing of the NYS National Guard at Hancock AFB. The 174th pilots hunter/killer Reaper drone robots 24/7 overAfghanistan and who knows where else. Many innocent human beings are thereby maimed or killed.

Lockheed Martin will demonstrate various military drones at Rome. Nonetheless it appears that the convention’s focus will be on the development and marketing of the domestic drone. Domestic and military development are by no means separate spheres: They promote and cross-pollinate each other. Their engineers and operators can move from one sphere to the other.

Commercial drone traffic will soon come to conveniently mask any non-commercial domestic droneflights. The military drone isn’t just “over there”; increasingly it is coming home to roost. Dronesurveillance, developed to spy and do recon over there, now has begun to infest our skies.

More and more police departments and government agencies are deploying drones in the “homeland.” The Hancock Reaper drone now has license to fly throughout much of Upstate New York (including overSyracuse) — of course, only “for training.” Drones surveil US borders both north and south — so a significant minority of the US population living within 100 miles of the border are also under surveillance.

The Federal Aviation Administration has for years, under immense pressure from both military and industry, been struggling with the knotty problem of regulating domestic drone flight. While the FAA may (or may not) develop appropriate regs protecting our airspace and our privacy, how will it enforce those regs?

Who is going to tell the police, the military, the government and its intelligence agencies that they are breaking the law — especially when those agencies operate with little transparency; when they can invoke “national security” to obscure and defend their illicit acts; when all those agencies are congenital scofflaws?

Can we trust either Mr. Trump or Mrs. Clinton, as President, to resist the temptation to deploy drones against certain individuals or groups or minorities they perceive as adversaries?

​​Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.

Truthout is widely read among people with lower ­incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.

We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so.

We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?