A top official in the national security division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) has alerted lawyers for former President Donald Trump that the department does not believe it has retrieved all of the documents that Trump improperly removed from the White House in his final days in office.
According to The New York Times, this is the “most concrete indication yet” that the department remains skeptical of Trump’s claims that he has cooperated with their inquiry into the missing documents.
Jay Bratt, who leads the DOJ’s counterintelligence operations, told Trump’s legal team in recent weeks that he doesn’t believe all of the documents have been returned, despite various attempts from the DOJ and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to retrieve them.
Trump’s lawyers formed two separate camps over how to respond to Bratt’s assertion, the Times reported. One side suggested hiring an outside firm to conduct additional searches for documents, just in case. But that proposal was overruled by the other camp of lawyers, who decided to take a more combative approach.
Bratt’s suggestion that there may be more documents in Trump’s possession comes as DOJ prosecutors have made similar claims in recent weeks, citing the discovery of empty folders marked as classified at Mar-a-Lago in a number of court filings. The fact that Trump could potentially have more White House documents in his possession “presents the potential for ongoing risk to national security,” the department said in court.
NARA has also expressed skepticism over whether all of the documents have been retrieved. “While there is no easy way to establish absolute accountability, we do know that we do not have custody of everything we should,” acting archivist Debra Steidal Wall said in a letter to House Oversight Committee chair Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-New York) this month.
The DOJ hasn’t publicly explained why it believes that some of the documents still haven’t been recovered. But the timeline of events over the past two years suggests that their suspicion may be warranted.
For several months after Trump left the White House, NARA reached out to the former president and his lawyers directly, requesting numerous times that the documents be returned. Trump only relented when the agency threatened to get Congress involved, allowing NARA to retrieve some of the documents from Mar-a-Lago in January of this year.
During that retrieval process, the agency discovered material that was highly classified, and notified the DOJ about documents that remained at the estate. The department then issued a subpoena ordering Trump to return all classified documents and to affirm that no additional classified material remained at Mar-a-Lago. A lawyer signed that affirmation on the former president’s behalf.
Later in the summer, the DOJ obtained evidence that Trump had lied and that additional classified documents were still being kept at Mar-a-Lago. The FBI conducted a search warrant on the property in early August, uncovering thousands of government documents, including more than 100 that were marked as classified.
Federal officials have retrieved more than 300 classified government documents from Mar-a-Lago since the start of this year.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.