A suspended policy that allowed local police to keep much of the assets they confiscate from fellow suspects — even those who have not been convicted or charged with any crime — was reinstated on Monday evening by the Department of Justice.
The notorious “equitable sharing” program permits local cops to use federal law to seize property, possessions, and cash from individuals they suspect of wrongdoing. It was temporarily halted in December.
A DOJ spokesperson, Peter Carr, told the Washington Post that an improved budget situation allowed the department to reinstate the program. Law enforcement organizations heavily lobbied for the restoration of equitable sharing, claiming that cutting off the revenue source made it more difficult to do their jobs.
Police departments typically get a higher return on assets forfeited under federal law than those given up under state law, the Post remarked, collecting as much as 80 percent of the value of items seized under US code.
Civil liberties groups have warned, however, that communities are actually suffering under the program as a result of misaligned interests, with cops depending on seizing assets to fund operations.
“Forfeiture was originally presented as a way to cripple large-scale criminal enterprises by diverting their resources,” the ACLU notes on its website. “But today, aided by deeply flawed federal and state laws, many police departments use forfeiture to benefit their bottom lines, making seizures motivated by profit rather than crime-fighting.”
A 2014 Washington Post report revealed just how reliant state and local police departments have been on equitable sharing. Since 2001, they’ve received more than $1.7 billion on the program. The paper identified more than 400 precincts and task forces that rely on wealth confiscated under federal and local laws to fund 20 percent or more of their budgets.
Individuals face enormous difficulties and expenses when they try to recoup assets seized by police, such as arbitrary deadlines and a lack of access to legal counsel. The paper found that only 41 percent of litigants were eventually successful in their efforts.
Scott Bullock, the president of the public interest law firm Institute of Justice told the Post on Monday that the department’s decision to turn the program back on was based on funding, and “not a genuine concern about the abuses rampant in the equitable sharing system.”
During a Senate hearing last April, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the Chairman of judiciary committee criticized lavish spending by both local and federal police made possible by asset forfeiture, claiming that whistleblowers have informed him of wrongdoing.
“US Marshals Service is spending asset forfeiture money on lavish office furnishings and facilities, like a $22,000 conference table and a $1.8 million training facility that lies unused nearly eleven months of the year,” Rep. Grassley alleged.
“This kind of cavalier spending is out of control,” he said.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy