Skip to content Skip to footer

Dog Factory Farms in the United States? Consumers Can End It.

To end cruel animal experimentation, consumers need to step up and refuse to use products tested on animals.

A drone view of Marshall BioResources, one of the largest breeders of dogs for experimentation in the United States.

Trapped inside a laboratory, Echo’s future looked grim. For six years, this lovable beagle suffered isolation, neglect and painful procedures. A product tested on Echo’s eyes left her blind. Then, a miraculous twist of fate changed Echo’s life forever. Beagle Freedom Project, a nonprofit that rescues and rehomes animals used in experimental research, saved Echo and found her a family. At her new home, Echo stepped out into the sunlight and pawed the unfamiliar texture of grass for the first time.

Echo is one of few survivors of the animal experimentation industry. Approximately 65,000 dogs are used in animal testing each year in the United States. This secretive industry breeds dogs, cats, rabbits and other animals into existence only to suffer agonizing experimentation. The animals may endure unnecessary surgeries, pesticide exposure or force feedings of harmful chemicals. Most of the dogs spend their lives alone in steel cages, only taken out for procedures or transportation.

The animal experimentation industry has recently attracted a deluge of public criticism. A 2020 investigation by the animal advocacy nonprofit Rise for Animals exposes a key industry facility named Marshall BioResources. Located in New York State, Marshall BioResources is one of the largest breeders of dogs for experimentation in the United States. From the street view, the facilities are obscured by tall pines, but a bird’s-eye view reveals expansive windowless warehouses indistinguishable from the factory farms that house animals used for food and fur production.

Trapped inside of Marshall BioResources are roughly 23,000 dogs, as well as cats, ferrets and other animals. Since 2007, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has cited Marshall BioResources for more than 20 violations of the federal Animal Welfare Act, including inadequate veterinary care and poor living conditions, revealing a pattern of abuse and neglect. After spending their early lives at Marshall BioResources, the dogs will be shipped to laboratories across the country.

The dog testing industry spans the globe. While Marshall BioResources is a primary source of dog breeding for experimentation, businesses generate the demand. As of 2017, every U.S. state with available data was home to facilities that experiment on dogs, ranging from four sites in South Dakota to 7,890 in Massachusetts. Many animal lovers support the dog experimentation industry without even realizing it.

Promising alternatives to animal experimentation are advancing rapidly. One option is bioprinting, which can produce lab-grown tissue, including bones, hearts and skin, using 3D printing technology. Paired with the conditions to foster regenerative cell growth, bioprinted tissue can behave similarly to human organs. Bioprinting and other innovative engineering solutions can reduce or eliminate testing on live animals and lower the costs of the resource-intensive animal experimentation process. This technology may also circumvent the limitations often associated with testing products intended for humans on nonhuman animals.

Consumers can accelerate the development and implementation of ethical alternatives to animal experimentation by avoiding products tested on animals. Thousands of businesses are already responding to consumer demand with commitments to cruelty-free products, including Dove, Herbal Essences and Aveda, while other companies are continuing to support animal suffering. Petco carries live ferrets raised at Marshall BioResources and sells products created by Marshall Pet Products, a company owned by Marshall BioResources. Rise for Animals and Beagle Freedom Project are encouraging consumers to call for Petco to end its partnership with Marshall BioResources. When consumers choose companies and products free from the cruelty of animal experimentation, they reduce the demand that sustains businesses like Marshall BioResources.

Legislative action is also creating change for animals used for experiments. In 2014, Minnesota became the first state in the nation to adopt the Beagle Freedom Bill, requiring laboratories to offer healthy dogs and cats for adoption after testing, instead of killing them. Ten other states have enacted the Beagle Freedom Bill since then. In 2020, California became the first state in the nation to put into effect a bill to ban the sale of cosmetics tested on animals. All states should consider ethical legislative actions to mitigate the extensive suffering caused by animal experimentation.

When Echo the beagle was first rescued, she was too afraid to even step out of her carrying kennel. During the weeks that followed, Echo’s caretakers watched her incredible transformation. Echo had experienced the unthinkable, but in a short time, she learned to trust, play and love. Every state in the nation is home to the kind of cruelty that Echo suffered, and every state has the opportunity to leverage consumer choice, technology and legislative action to end animal experimentation. Animals like Echo are counting on us.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 4 days to add 310 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.