Skip to content Skip to footer

Despite Public Education’s Gains, a Widening Cultural Lag Remains

One wonders how the current model of K-12 education can transition fast enough to keep up or whether it can keep up at all.

Over the past few years, the debate over the state of K-12 public education has intensified. Some have made the claim that public education is in a state of crisis for reasons such as crumbling school buildings, uneven quality and availability of teaching staff and rising poverty rates among students and disengaged parents. In response, policymakers have championed new policy ideas in search of a path forward to “fix” public education.

Despite the challenges, graduation rates have reached an all — time high, and more students are entering colleges and universities. According to the Department of Education, 82 percent of high school seniors graduated in the 2013 — 2014 school year. In fall 2015, some 20.2 million students are expected to attend US colleges and universities, constituting an increase of about 4.9 million since fall 2000. So what seems to be the problem?

The challenge, I believe, lies in a growing recognition of a widening lag between the structure of the economy and society at large, which is adding pressure and taxing the capacity of the system of public education to adapt to the new demands of our increasingly complex economy.

To this end, it may be useful to look at the challenges facing the public highway and transportation infrastructure system, with attention to the purposes it served when it was first built. In this analysis, we can also look at how this informs the issue at hand.

The public freeway/highway system was originally designed for domestic use. It connected the states, allowed easy travel for commuters, significantly reduced the time and cost associated with the flow of local and interstate commerce and improved the movement of the military, emergency and other related traffic. It benefited business and government to a significant degree and made it more convenient for consumers to get around.

In 2016, the freeway/highway system is clogged with much higher volumes of commuter traffic and a rapidly expanding number of larger commercial trucks moving goods in and out of markets that connect the various production centers around the world. The freeway system was built for a 1950s economy. However, the primary, initial intent of the freeway/highway system has stretched beyond its original purpose and does not readily meet the vastly expanding requirements associated with local, regional, national and global demographic and commercial transformation.

The most visible economic trends that are outpacing the public education system have unfolded in two distinguishable but integrally linked areas: digital tools and robotics, and globalization. These two structural changes in the economy have introduced new conditions and added a new standard of expectations in the delivery of services.

As a stark illustration of what we’re up against: K-12 public education still remains largely a localized, paper-based system. Many school districts’ internal processes still rely on the large-scale use of paper. In response, federal, state and district leaders have called for a piecemeal retrofitting of public schools (e.g., via student computers, computer programming and common core curricula) to make them more responsive to the provision of instruction that preparesa workforce for the new realities of the complex economy that is increasingly globally connected. It is not clear, however, whether public school systems (as they are currently organized) can keep up with demands from workers and industry alike. The situation points to what we call a “cultural lag” between the rapid pace of scientific and technological change in terms of how goods and services are produced and moved on the one hand, and the readiness of the school system and families to adapt to help keep the system moving smoothly.

Companies like Amazon have leveraged the resources of the internet to raise the standard of expectations in order tomove goods and services on a global scale to achieve a 24-hour “click to get” delivery cycle. By contrast, the publiceducation schedule remains a five-day a week, 8 am to 4 pm operation. It is the lag between the “instant gratification world” and the public education system’s inability to deliver services at the same rate of expectation that is creating agreater loss of faith in the public education system as a whole. A US News and World Report article, “The Education-Technology Revolution Is Coming” echoes this critical point:

In the publishing industry, Borders had difficulty meeting changing customer preferences in the digital era. While they struggled to adapt, Amazon established an open platform that gave users more control, letting readers buy and share and discover on their own terms. It let them go mobile with the Kindle and Kindle apps.

Education institutions are now grappling with the same challenge Borders faced: how to connect with savvier and more discerning consumers who have more options today than they did even a few years ago. These consumers — these active learners — have different expectations for their education experience. Administrators must be aware that active learners are willing to go elsewhere if they don’t feel their expectations are being met.

Although the US News and World Report article makes the case that students have other options when schools cannot offer more digitally-driven services in curricula and instruction, this may not be the case for less-resourced students that rely solely on the public education system as their path toward a future career.

The growing cultural lag between the economy and public education is not only undermining the faith of consumers of public education services, but also is raising concerns among industry leaders as to the availability of a skilled workforce in the US in the coming future. Notably, CEO Jonas Prising of ManpowerGroup — a global workforce staffing firm — points out that:

Technology is evolving faster than ever, changing the skills needed for jobs and shortening the life cycle of those skills. We are also seeing a bifurcation of the workforce — those with in — demand skills versus those with high-supply skills. Yet, too little has changed in these ten years.

While more public investment is always welcome in our most precious resource — our children — the crux of the challenge rests upon restructuring an educational system to make it more responsive to meet the increasing expectations in the delivery of services it is responsible for providing. With the needs of workers and industry changing so fast to be competitive, one wonders how the current model of K-12 education can transition fast enoughto keep up or whether it can keep up at all.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.