Skip to content Skip to footer

Department of Labor Gives Federal Contractors a License to Discriminate

Our tax dollars pay federal contractors, which means we’re paying for discrimination.

People gather outside the Supreme Court to protest the decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission which ruled in favor of Colorado baker Jack Phillips on Monday, June 4, 2018.

Federal contractors, who stand to make billions in taxpayer money by providing a variety of services to the government, are subject to strict and labyrinthine rules surrounding business practices. In some cases, these rules are actually more stringent than those under state and federal law for private sector employers — for example, contractors are required to aggressively pursue and hire disabled employment candidates.

Under the Trump administration, however, many requirements around diversity and inclusion, as well as nondiscrimination, are being quietly discarded.

Most recently, the Department of Labor issued a directive effectively encouraging contractors to discriminate against LGBTQ people on the grounds of religious beliefs. According to this document, religious businesses — and let’s be clear, they mean Christian businesses — should feel free to discriminate in hiring and firing practices.

“Recent court decisions have addressed the broad freedoms and anti-discrimination protections that must be afforded religion-exercising organizations and individuals,” the directive states, in simultaneously bland and galling phrasing that suggests being required to stop discriminating against people is itself discrimination.

The directive goes on to erroneously namecheck the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision in its justification of bigotry and references “recent executive orders” which have repeatedly bolstered so-called “religious conscience” objections.

This represents a radical shift from the agency’s recent historical stance on LGBTQ discrimination. The agency used to affirm that it was legal to “favor individuals of a certain religion” in employment decisions, but noted that anti-discrimination protections were still very much in play. In other words, a Christian-owned contractor could preferentially hire Christians, but he or she could not discriminate against LGBTQ people in employment practices. Now, that guidance has been quietly removed.

This policy joins a larger body of legislation and caselaw affirming a “right to discriminate,” taking a huge step back from decades of civil rights advocacy. Many of these cases revolve around “religious freedom,” which again is specifically focused on Christians — especially conservative Christians. There’s even a “Religious Liberty Task Force” charged with upholding the right to use religion as an excuse for hateful behavior.

In the guise of “religious freedom,” bigots insist that discrimination should be allowable, because being obliged to hire, serve or work with people who aren’t like them would violate their religious beliefs. This religious exemption opens the door to a variety of discriminatory behaviors in the workplace. It bears noting that Jesus didn’t object to being hung on the Cross alongside two thieves, so surely allowing a lesbian in the mailroom won’t ruin the sanctity of a Christian business.

Using vague language is also very much by design. By keeping the guidance as broad as possible, the agency opens up numerous loopholes to exploit. Should a contractor be challenged on discriminatory behavior, it can fall back on the defense that the guidance isn’t specific, so they aren’t doing anything wrong. Meanwhile, people attempting to file suit have nothing to point to when they feel they’ve experienced discrimination.

This kind of discriminatory policy is frustrating and infuriating at the best of times. But in this case, it comes with an added sting: Our tax dollars pay federal contractors.

That means that everyone in the US is paying companies to discriminate, including LGBTQ people. This guidance will affect millions of people across the United States, with federal contractors making up a large chunk of the economy and including numerous big names in industry, like Lockheed Martin.

The Department of Labor has said it will follow this guidance with rulemaking. While that would provide Americans with a chance to weigh in on any attempt to enshrine discriminatory practices into the law, it’s important to stay alert, because the period for public comment will likely be short.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy