President Donald Trump’s campaign advisers are reportedly urging him to approach the final debate of the 2020 presidential election season with a calmer demeanor, but he appears already to be dismissing the strategy by attacking the character of the moderator just days before the debate is set to take place.
Those coaching Trump on how to improve upon his dismal showing at the first debate tell Axios they are advising him to appear more likable this time around. Trump is being advised not to interrupt his opponent, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, which he did 71 times during the first debate. (Biden interrupted Trump 22 times.)
The Trump campaign hopes that the president can turn his prospects around in the final weeks of the election by coming off as more genial.
“All Trump has to do is give people permission to vote for him.… He did exactly the opposite of that in the first debate,” one adviser explained to Axios. “So hopefully he can right the ship in this one, because his re-election may depend on it.”
Trump is already deviating from the plan, however, by tweeting disparaging comments about the debate’s moderator, NBC News’s White House correspondent Kristen Welker.
“She’s always been terrible & unfair, just like most of the Fake News reporters,” Trump said in his social media post over the weekend, “but I’ll still play the game.”
Trump’s tweet quoted a tweet from his son, Don Jr., which cited an article from the New York Post tabloid website that claimed Welker has “deep Democrat [sic] ties.”
Several media pundits and political operatives came to Welker’s defense.
“Ask anyone in politics in D.C., D[emocrat] or R[epublican] and they’ll tell you what a real pro she is,” wrote Joe Lockhart, who served as press secretary for former President Bill Clinton.
Even individuals within Trump’s orbit have made glowing remarks on Welker in the past.
“I have a very high opinion of Kristen Welker,” Trump campaign adviser Jason Miller recently said. “I think she’s going to do an excellent job as the moderator…. I think she’s a journalist who is very fair in her approach. And I think she’ll be a very good choice for this third debate.”
Topics for the third debate announced by Welker late last week include COVID-19, American families, race in the U.S., climate change, national security and leadership.
Trump’s criticisms of Welker come as the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) announced it will meet on Monday afternoon to discuss potentially changing aspects of the final debate. (The second debate was cancelled.) What they might alter, however, is unknown, and the CPD may choose to leave the format unchanged.
The CPD attempted to schedule a debate for last week, which was intended to be a town hall-style event, with social distancing rules and remote participation for both candidates, after Trump tested positive for coronavirus earlier this month. When those changes were announced, however, the president refused to participate, and the two candidates instead held competing town hall discussions on different television networks.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.