Skip to content Skip to footer

Confidentiality Laws Limit Trump Administration’s Search for Citizenship Data

The Census Bureau is required to protect people’s privacy, no matter where their data comes from.

Demonstrators rally at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on April 23, 2019, to protest a proposal to add a citizenship question in the 2020 Census.

Months after the Supreme Court blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, the administration is trying a different way to collect data on the citizenship status of everyone living in the United States. The administration’s renewed effort, announced via executive order in July, has raised concerns about how the administration is allowed to use the information it collects.

The order specifically directs the Census Bureau to collect administrative records on citizenship from other federal agencies, such as the Department of Homeland Security. The order has met with immediate pushback. Several groups are suing to block the bureau from gathering these records, arguing that doing so would violate the Constitution and federal law. And experts have questioned whether the plan put forth in that order is feasible. But there’s one thing to know regardless of how these disputes are resolved: any data the bureau collects pursuant to the order will be protected by the same ironclad laws that protect the confidentiality of census data.

As we’ve previously explained in a detailed report, Federal Laws That Protect Census Confidentiality, those laws are robust and clear-cut. For example, Title 13 of the U.S. Code — otherwise known as the Census Act — contains the following prohibitions:

  • It is illegal for the Census Bureau to disclose any personally identifiable information.
  • It is illegal for census data to be used for any nonstatistical purpose. Thus, the government cannot use census data for things like immigration enforcement or criminal prosecution.
  • It is illegal for anyone except for Census Bureau employees to see census responses. Bureau employees are sworn to secrecy under the threat of criminal prosecution, and they can be sent to prison for up to five years and fined up to $250,000 if they break their oath.
  • It is illegal for the Census Bureau to give census responses to other government agencies. In other words, agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement have no legal way to access census responses.
  • It is illegal for the federal government to use census responses to harm anyone.

All these prohibitions apply equally to any information the bureau gathers using administrative records from other agencies. If, for example, a household does not respond to the decennial census, the bureau may try to use records from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to figure out the demographics of the people living in that household. Once the bureau gets that information from the HUD, it is subject to the same confidentiality protections as any other data the bureau collects. The same holds for any information that the Trump administration may gather through its executive order.

The bureau, in essence, operates as a sort of vacuum: it can take in most any information it wants, but it cannot release that information unless it complies with all the applicable confidentiality restrictions. (Deputy Census Bureau Director Ron Jarmin reportedly described the bureau as a “data roach motel” for this reason: “Data come in identifiable form, and don’t come out in identifiable form.”) Bureau policy endorses this view, and specifically notes that Title 13 protects administrative records the bureau receives from other agencies. The bureau’s chief scientist, moreover, confirmed this strict confidentiality policy in a recent presentation on collecting administrative records on citizenship.

Title 13 is just one of the many laws that protect the confidentiality of census data. Other federal laws, including the Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act, the Privacy Act, and the tax code, provide additional safeguards. (A comprehensive guide to the laws that protect the confidentiality of Census Bureau data is available here.)

The strength of the confidentiality protections in these and other federal laws reflects an acknowledgement by Congress that confidentiality is essential to getting people to respond to the census. The census determines the distribution of political power across the nation, as well as the amount of funding that communities get for necessities like food, schools, and roads. With the stakes so high, it should come as no surprise that the confidentiality laws are highly protective.

Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $120,000 in one-time donations and to add 1383 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy