Washington – Ahead of a key bilateral summit between U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese leader Hu Jintao, which begins here Tuesday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a sweeping China-U.S. policy speech Friday, setting the tone for next week’s meet.
Clinton’s address capped a weeklong parade of curtain-raising speeches by other top cabinet officials, revealing the importance that the Obama administration places on Beijing-Washington dealings.
Her message was broad, touching on key issues – trade, security, human rights – and places – Iran, North Korea, Taiwan – important to the bilateral relationship. But her message, like those of this week’s other key addresses, was also clear, focusing firmly on the need for mutual cooperation on both divisive and shared issues.
“Moving forward, it is up to both of us to more consistently translate positive words into effective cooperation,” she said. “It is up to both of us to deal with our differences… We need to deal with them wisely and responsibly. And it is up to both of us to meet our respective global responsibilities and obligations.”
The country’s top diplomat also addressed the growing concern in some circles over Beijing’s modernising military, its increasingly assertive foreign policy, and a resurgence of Chinese nationalism.
“Some in the region and some here at home see China’s growth as a threat that will lead either to Cold War-style conflict or American decline,” Clinton said. “And some in China worry that the United States is bent on containing China’s rise and constraining China’s growth… We reject those views.”
“In the 21st century, it does not make sense to apply zero- sum 19th century theories of how major powers interact,” she said.
Experts see next week’s high-level meeting as an opportunity to “reset” Sino-U.S. relations and steer them in a more mutually beneficial course.
“The trip has symbolic importance as it will put to an end a period of disturbance in the relationship over the past year,” said Douglas H. Paal, vice president of studies for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Disputes in 2010, such as U.S.-Taiwan arms sales, China’s refusal to condemn North Korea for allegedly sinking a South Korean ship, and skirmishes with Japan and other South China Sea neighbours over territorial claims, have rocked relations.
North Korea is set to be high on next week’s agenda, as officials say the administration will continue to build on recent discussions with Beijing about taming Pyongyang’s provocations and scaling back its nuclear programme.
The secretary also drew attention to China’s egregious human rights record, calling for increased freedoms for its citizens and the release of Liu Xiaobo and other political prisoners.
More broadly, however, Clinton’s address – and the rhetoric from other officials this week – tried hard to be future- focused.
“[The trip] has greater importance going forward,” Paal commented. “We are going into a key election year – not just for the United States, but also for Taiwan, Korea, and even in its own way for China, which has a selection process for its new political leadership in 2012…. The two presidents have a chance to set the main contours of the relationship going forward.”
This relationship is arguably the most interdependent it has ever been, analysts say, with the administration perceiving its positive stewardship as key to regional and global stability.
A leaked diplomatic cable from February 2008 predicts, “The United States and China share important and growing political and economic interests that will bind us indefinitely, despite frictions. Where interests vary or compete, we share a common interest in managing our differences.”
A facet of this interdependence, or “entanglement” as Clinton said in her speech, is the trade partnership between Beijing and Washington.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke – in U.S.-China policy addresses made earlier this week relating to their own sectors – called for Beijing to allow for the faster appreciation of its undervalued currency and to further open its markets for U.S. and international access.
“It’s very important to understand that this is a relationship with very substantial economic benefits to the United States,” Geithner told reporters at a briefing Friday. “Last year our exports to China passed the 100- billion-dollar mark.”
At the same time, Beijing seeks to acquire U.S.-made high- technology and expand trade and investment here.
“China is likely to become our largest trading partner sometime roughly 10 years from today,” Geithner noted.
“The numbers say something,” National Security Advisor Tom Donilon said at the same briefing. “This will be the eighth face-to-face meeting between President Obama and President Hu Jintao of China… That pace and intensity of engagement with the Chinese reflects the breadth, depth, and importance of the relationship.”
Visit IPS news for fresh perspectives on development and globalization.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.