Tel Aviv, Israel – A day after Vice President Joe Biden ended a fence-mending trip marred by the Israel settlement issue, tension hung over the embattled city of Jerusalem both in the streets and in government offices.
Israeli police in the capital went on high alert for violent demonstrations after Friday prayers in East Jerusalem – and the military enforced a total closure on Palestinians in the West Bank. Claimed by Palestinians as their future capital, it is increasingly emerging as the front line between competing Israeli and Palestinian visions for statehood.
Also see: Building Settlements, Not Peace
Later Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu got a telephone call from a “frustrated” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who reiterated America’s displeasure over the surprise announcement of a 1,600 home development project in East Jerusalem, a move that upended Mr. Biden’s visit.
In what was reportedly a 43-minute conversation, Clinton “[made] clear the United States considered the announcement a deeply negative signal about Israel’s approach to the bilateral relationship and counter to the spirit of the vice president’s trip,” said State Department spokesperson P.J. Crowley.
“The secretary said she could not understand how this happened, particularly in light of the United States’ strong commitment to Israel’s security,” added Mr. Crowley.
50,000 Housing Units Reportedly Under Way
Control over the city was once considered the final and ultimate dispute for Israeli and Palestinian negotiators. But in recent weeks, it has been brought front and center by weekly rioting, demonstrations, and plans for new building projects.
The intensification of the dispute over the city holy to three religions jeopardizes last weekend’s agreement to restart peace talks – the first in more than a year. In recent days, the Palestinians have called on the US to force Israel to drop the building project.
“If Israel will continue business as usual with settlements, and the Americans are not in a position to do anything in this regard, that’s something that the Palestinian leadership has difficulty living with,” said government spokesman Ghassan Khatib.
In addition to the 1,600 units announced this week for ultra-Orthodox families in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Ramat Shlomo, the Israeli government has plans for a total of 50,000 more housing units in east Jerusalem in the coming years, Haaretz reported this week.
Israeli Parliament Speaker: We Must Say Clearly We Won’t Compromise
The building plans outrage the Palestinians who see Israel’s building over the Green Line in Jerusalem as a plan to block any compromise in Jerusalem. Israel’s government considers the city, which was united in 1967 after 18 years of divided rule, part of the “eternal capital” of the Jewish state.
Israeli Parliament Speaker Reuven Rivlin said that Israel should be honest with the Palestinians and the US that it will not compromise: “We must say clearly and put it on the table. You can’t talk about peace if Jerusalem is divided.”
The drama is playing out at flash points around the city. In the past three weeks, Palestinians and police have clashed several times on the Temple Mount complex. The location that includes both Judaism’s holiest site and Islam’s third holiest threatens to turn a political dispute into a holy war.
An “Affront to the US”
Outside of the Old City and in Palestinian neighborhoods, there were isolated instances Friday of Palestinians throwing rocks at Israeli police. In addition to the building projects, Palestinians are upset by attempts of right-wing Jewish Israelis to buy up property in their neighborhoods. In the Jerusalem village of Silwan, the municipality wants to destroy about 90 Palestinian homes – allegedly built without permits – and turn the neighborhood into a park and tourist commercial center. The plan has stirred opposition from Palestinians.
Scott Lasensky, a Middle East Expert at the US Institute for Peace, says that Washington must ignite a public debate on the future of Jerusalem with high-profile diplomacy, while lowering the profile of isolated battles like the housing project.
“The principal challenge for the US today, at the diplomatic level, is to quickly move forward in the negotiations, put ideas on the table, and get a serious debate going on both sides about what a two-state solution might look like,” he said in an email. “The unfortunate events of the past week, which are widely viewed in Washington as an affront to the United States, can be dealt with most effectively through private channels.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.