Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Chancellor Asks California Community College to Hold Off on 2-Tier Tuition Plan

Los Angeles – The chancellor of the California community college system has requested that Santa Monica College hold off on its plan to begin offering popular courses for a higher price this summer, saying that the legality of the program is still in question. The request, made on Wednesday, came a day after a campus … Continued

Los Angeles – The chancellor of the California community college system has requested that Santa Monica College hold off on its plan to begin offering popular courses for a higher price this summer, saying that the legality of the program is still in question.

The request, made on Wednesday, came a day after a campus police officer sprayed more than two dozen people with pepper spray as students tried to enter a trustees meeting; several suffered minor injuries. Many students and advocates have criticized the tuition plan, saying it violates the long tradition of community colleges as havens for those who cannot afford four-year colleges.

The chancellor, Jack Scott, had already made it clear that he was wary of the community college’s plan, saying it could violate state education codes. He has asked the state’s attorney general for an opinion, which he expects to receive in the next week.

“The question, of course, is that the price may well rule out low-income students, and does that go against our philosophy of being open to all? That is the heart of the issue,” Dr. Scott said in an interview. “I understand the problem they have, and I am the first to say we need more funding from the state, but this really opens the gates in an unusual way to something I am not sure we want to have.”

“We do not have the authority to tell them cease and desist, but I said I think it would be wise to wait until we have a determination from the attorney general,” Dr. Scott said. A bill that would have explicitly permitted the tuition structure died in the State Legislature last year.

Bruce Smith, a spokesman for the college, said that its president, Chui L. Tsang, told Dr. Scott that he would consider the request, but that any decision would have to be approved by the board of trustees.

Last month, the board approved a plan that would offer about 50 high-demand courses at $180 per credit hour, rather than the regular $36. Administrators have said that the higher tuition would just cover the costs for each course. Registration is scheduled to begin next month.

For years, the college has faced increased demand and overcrowded classes as the state has cut financing. Students routinely complain about not being able to register for classes that they need for job training and for transferring to four-year colleges — a problem that plagues community colleges across the country.

Dr. Tsang has said that he believes that the plan is legal and is the only way to try to meet the demand.

The student protest on Tuesday erupted when board members said they would go ahead with the plan despite the controversy. For now, the college plans to offer the higher-priced courses only in the summer and winter sessions.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.