Several news outlets reported this week about recommendations made by a team of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) researchers that aimed to give advice on how schools across the country could begin to reopen amid the continued coronavirus pandemic. But while these headlines were widely shared on social media, many may have missed a huge caveat in the researchers’ guidance.
The CDC officials’ viewpoint piece, published online in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), suggested that “the preponderance of available evidence from the fall school semester has been reassuring,” noting that the spread of the virus, compared to what has been observed in nursing homes or in workplaces for example, “has not been reported in education settings in schools.”
Head author Margaret Honein, speaking to The Washington Post about the published piece, noted that “with proper prevention efforts … we can keep transmission in schools and educational settings quite low.”
“With good prevention, we can safely reopen and keep open more schools,” Honein added in her comments to The Post.
The major proviso in the piece published by Honein and her CDC colleagues is that schools cannot reopen unless certain precautions are taken first, including within the communities themselves where the schools are located.
While the report notes that “mitigation measures in schools must continue” — including mask use, increasing physical distance between students by lowering class sizes, using hybrid attendance models where needed, increasing air ventilation, and expanding coronavirus testing — efforts to contain COVID outside of schools need to be adhered to as well.
“Preventing transmission in school settings will require addressing and reducing levels of transmission in the surrounding communities through policies to interrupt transmission (eg, restrictions on indoor dining at restaurants),” the CDC researchers wrote.
In order to ensure the safe operation of schools, communities will likely have to make “difficult” decisions, the report adds in its concluding paragraph, including “a commitment to implement community-based policies that reduce transmission.”
The conditions placed on reopening schools, particularly for communities, may be problematic for a number of places across the country, as many Americans are still refusing to take the pandemic seriously, even after more than 425,000 have died from COVID in the U.S. so far.
While a majority of Americans describe themselves as “very worried” or “somewhat worried” about coronavirus in a recently published Economist/YouGov poll, nearly 4 in 10 (39 percent) say they are “not too worried” or “not worried at all.”
Other polls in recent months have shown that many in the U.S. are refusing to adhere to social distancing standards, thwarting CDC guidelines on how to lessen the spread of COVID-19. A Gallup poll in November, for example, found that 31 percent of respondents believed people without symptoms should continue to “lead normal lives” rather than try to stay at home as much as possible to prevent contracting the virus. A separate poll from that same month found that between 25 and 30 percent of Americans were still planning to travel for Thanksgiving, in spite of the CDC’s advice not to do so.
In December, a HealthDay/Harris poll also found that only two-thirds of Americans (66 percent) were “always” wearing masks whenever they traveled outside of the home — a figure that represents a declining rate from the same poll taken months prior.
If schools across the nation are desiring to reopen, these numbers likely need to show marked improvement before communities can do so in a safe way.
While studies have demonstrated that children are less likely than older individuals to face harm from the virus, it doesn’t mean that they are completely safe or immune from the dangers of COVID-19. Additionally, even if a child doesn’t present symptoms or get sick while being a carrier of the coronavirus, a number of studies have shown that children are just as likely as adults to spread the virus to others.
In short, if schools reopen in communities that have largely neglected to adhere to social distancing principles or mask-wearing, there’s a high likelihood that coronavirus will continue to be a significant problem, even if districts implement policies for students that have been proven to work.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.