Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Boehner Debt Plan Cuts Too Little, Forcing Another Vote Delay

House Speaker John Boehner was rewriting his plan to cut federal spending and raise the debt ceiling Tuesday night after the Congressional Budget Office revealed that his bill wouldn't cut as much spending as he'd promised it would. The non-partisan CBO determined that Boehner's plan would cut spending by $850 billion over the next decade, less than the $1.2 trillion promised in the bill. CBO's scoring came on the eve of a vote in the House of Representatives on Boehner's plan, which was already struggling to gain enough votes among Republican members. “CBO estimates that the legislation would reduce budget deficits by about $850 billion between 2012 and 2021 relative to CBO's March 2011 baseline,” the CBO wrote in a letter to Boehner Tuesday.

House Speaker John Boehner was rewriting his plan to cut federal spending and raise the debt ceiling Tuesday night after the Congressional Budget Office revealed that his bill wouldn't cut as much spending as he'd promised it would.

The non-partisan CBO determined that Boehner's plan would cut spending by $850 billion over the next decade, less than the $1.2 trillion promised in the bill. CBO's scoring came on the eve of a vote in the House of Representatives on Boehner's plan, which was already struggling to gain enough votes among Republican members.

“CBO estimates that the legislation would reduce budget deficits by about $850 billion between 2012 and 2021 relative to CBO's March 2011 baseline,” the CBO wrote in a letter to Boehner Tuesday.

<!— story_feature_box.comp —><!— /story_feature_box.comp —>

Michael Steel, a Boehner spokesman, said the speaker is reworking his plan. It was undetermined when a vote on the revamped plan will occur.

“We're here to change Washington — no more smoke and mirrors, no more 'phantom cuts,'” Steel said. “We promised that we will cut spending more than we increase the debt limit — with no tax hikes — and we will keep that promise. As we speak, congressional staff are looking at options to re-write the legislation to meet our pledge.”

Before Boehner's setback, congressional Democrats and Republicans appear headed for a clash Wednesday over dueling plans to cut spending and raise the federal debt ceiling, while the head of the International Monetary Fund warned Tuesday of dire consequences for the world economy if lawmakers fail to act by the August 2 default deadline.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid forged ahead his own plan, which could come up for a votes as early as Thursday.

“We're in a stalemate,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Tuesday. “I mean, this is the problem we have, is that we need Congress to produce something that is a compromise and that, therefore, can get support from Democrats and Republicans in both houses and reach the president's desk and meet the president's approval.”

The fate of both plans was uncertain Tuesday.

In the House of Representatives, Rep. Jim Jordan, a tea party-backed Republican from Ohio, said there aren't 218 GOP votes to pass Boehner's two-step plan to cut federal spending by $1.2 trillion and extend the debt ceiling for about six months. Many conservatives think it wouldn't cut spending enough.

House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland said Boehner shouldn't look to House Democrats to help him push his plan through. Hoyer predicted that “very few” Democrats would vote for it.

Carney repeated President Barack Obama's threat to veto Boehner's bill should it make it through Congress, which he said isn't going to happen because the Senate would never pass it.

The Boehner solution suffered another blow Tuesday when the conservative Club for Growth came out against it, calling it a poor alternative to the so-called “cut, cap and balance” measure that passed the House last week. That measure died in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

“The Boehner plan does not achieve the goals of cut, cap and balance, and doesn't fix our fiscal mess,” club president Chris Chocola said in a statement. “We are urging club members to call their members of Congress and ask them to oppose it.”

The US Chamber of Commerce, on the other hand, backed the Boehner plan. In a letter to all House members, the chamber urged them to vote for the plan, saying that “this legislation is critical. Default on our debt obligations is not an acceptable option. The time for Congress to act is now.”

On the Senate side of the Capitol, Reid was having a hard time mustering enough Republican support to get the 60 votes he needs to pass his plan, which is similar to Boehner's. The major difference is that Reid's plan would extend the federal government's borrowing authority through 2012 — beyond the presidential and congressional elections — while Boehner's would extend it for about six months, requiring another extension battle next winter, when electoral politics will be even more intense.

“After our meeting today … we decided that members of our caucus would start reaching out to our Republican colleagues and encourage them to support our plan,” Reid told reporters. “The Senate plan is a reasonable plan. … Speaker Boehner's plan is not a compromise. It's written for the tea party, not the American people.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) signaled that Reid should expect little cooperation from Republicans.

“Stating the obvious, we believe the Reid proposal is not a serious effort to address deficit and debt and it should be defeated,” McConnell said. “And we need to re-engage with the president, the only person who can sign a bill into law, and get a bipartisan solution that can pass the House, pass the Senate, and be signed by the president.”

The bitter impasse over the debt ceiling and deficit plans is making international financial markets nervous, said Christine Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund. Speaking to the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, she said that “the clock is ticking, and clearly the issue needs to be resolved immediately” for the world's sake.

“Indeed, an adverse fiscal shock in the United States could have serious spillover for the rest of the world,” Lagarde said. Either a default or downgrading of US debt by ratings agencies “would be a very, very, very serious event, not just for the United States but for the global economy at large.”

© 2011 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services

Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.

Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $93,000 in one-time donations and to add 1295 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy