House Speaker John Boehner was rewriting his plan to cut federal spending and raise the debt ceiling Tuesday night after the Congressional Budget Office revealed that his bill wouldn't cut as much spending as he'd promised it would.
The non-partisan CBO determined that Boehner's plan would cut spending by $850 billion over the next decade, less than the $1.2 trillion promised in the bill. CBO's scoring came on the eve of a vote in the House of Representatives on Boehner's plan, which was already struggling to gain enough votes among Republican members.
“CBO estimates that the legislation would reduce budget deficits by about $850 billion between 2012 and 2021 relative to CBO's March 2011 baseline,” the CBO wrote in a letter to Boehner Tuesday.
<!— story_feature_box.comp —><!— /story_feature_box.comp —>
Michael Steel, a Boehner spokesman, said the speaker is reworking his plan. It was undetermined when a vote on the revamped plan will occur.
“We're here to change Washington — no more smoke and mirrors, no more 'phantom cuts,'” Steel said. “We promised that we will cut spending more than we increase the debt limit — with no tax hikes — and we will keep that promise. As we speak, congressional staff are looking at options to re-write the legislation to meet our pledge.”
Before Boehner's setback, congressional Democrats and Republicans appear headed for a clash Wednesday over dueling plans to cut spending and raise the federal debt ceiling, while the head of the International Monetary Fund warned Tuesday of dire consequences for the world economy if lawmakers fail to act by the August 2 default deadline.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid forged ahead his own plan, which could come up for a votes as early as Thursday.
“We're in a stalemate,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Tuesday. “I mean, this is the problem we have, is that we need Congress to produce something that is a compromise and that, therefore, can get support from Democrats and Republicans in both houses and reach the president's desk and meet the president's approval.”
The fate of both plans was uncertain Tuesday.
In the House of Representatives, Rep. Jim Jordan, a tea party-backed Republican from Ohio, said there aren't 218 GOP votes to pass Boehner's two-step plan to cut federal spending by $1.2 trillion and extend the debt ceiling for about six months. Many conservatives think it wouldn't cut spending enough.
House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland said Boehner shouldn't look to House Democrats to help him push his plan through. Hoyer predicted that “very few” Democrats would vote for it.
Carney repeated President Barack Obama's threat to veto Boehner's bill should it make it through Congress, which he said isn't going to happen because the Senate would never pass it.
The Boehner solution suffered another blow Tuesday when the conservative Club for Growth came out against it, calling it a poor alternative to the so-called “cut, cap and balance” measure that passed the House last week. That measure died in the Democratic-controlled Senate.
“The Boehner plan does not achieve the goals of cut, cap and balance, and doesn't fix our fiscal mess,” club president Chris Chocola said in a statement. “We are urging club members to call their members of Congress and ask them to oppose it.”
The US Chamber of Commerce, on the other hand, backed the Boehner plan. In a letter to all House members, the chamber urged them to vote for the plan, saying that “this legislation is critical. Default on our debt obligations is not an acceptable option. The time for Congress to act is now.”
On the Senate side of the Capitol, Reid was having a hard time mustering enough Republican support to get the 60 votes he needs to pass his plan, which is similar to Boehner's. The major difference is that Reid's plan would extend the federal government's borrowing authority through 2012 — beyond the presidential and congressional elections — while Boehner's would extend it for about six months, requiring another extension battle next winter, when electoral politics will be even more intense.
“After our meeting today … we decided that members of our caucus would start reaching out to our Republican colleagues and encourage them to support our plan,” Reid told reporters. “The Senate plan is a reasonable plan. … Speaker Boehner's plan is not a compromise. It's written for the tea party, not the American people.”
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) signaled that Reid should expect little cooperation from Republicans.
“Stating the obvious, we believe the Reid proposal is not a serious effort to address deficit and debt and it should be defeated,” McConnell said. “And we need to re-engage with the president, the only person who can sign a bill into law, and get a bipartisan solution that can pass the House, pass the Senate, and be signed by the president.”
The bitter impasse over the debt ceiling and deficit plans is making international financial markets nervous, said Christine Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund. Speaking to the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, she said that “the clock is ticking, and clearly the issue needs to be resolved immediately” for the world's sake.
“Indeed, an adverse fiscal shock in the United States could have serious spillover for the rest of the world,” Lagarde said. Either a default or downgrading of US debt by ratings agencies “would be a very, very, very serious event, not just for the United States but for the global economy at large.”
© 2011 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.