Skip to content Skip to footer

Biden Picks Jerome Powell to Lead Federal Reserve Despite Progressive Warnings

Progressive advocates and lawmakers have warned that Powell is soft on Wall Street and climate issues.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell testifies at a House Financial Services Committee hearing on oversight of the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve coronavirus pandemic response on Capitol Hill on September 30, 2021 in Washington, D.C.

On Monday, the White House announced that President Joe Biden is planning to nominate Republican Jerome Powell for his second term as chair of the Federal Reserve, one of the most influential positions in Washington.

Alongside Powell, Biden will nominate Lael Brainard as vice chair. Brainard is the only Democrat on the seven-person Fed board and was previously being considered by the White House as a leading candidate to replace Powell.

The two appointments will then go to the Senate, where progressive lawmakers will likely put up a fight against Powell’s nomination — particularly Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts), who has called Powell a “dangerous man” due to his record over his first four-year tenure.

Since Powell’s original nomination by Donald Trump, he has been panned by progressive advocates and lawmakers for not being strict enough when it comes to regulating banks and Wall Street. He has also been criticized for his ignorance on climate issues.

If confirmed, Powell will hold great influence over the economy during a time of rising housing prices, high inflation and instability in the labor market.

In a statement announcing the nomination, the White House noted the administration’s belief that it is important to have steady leadership at the Fed as the pandemic continues.

“Fundamentally, if we want to continue to build on the economic success of this year we need stability and independence at the Federal Reserve — and I have full confidence after their trial by fire over the last 20 months that Chair Powell and Dr. Brainard will provide the strong leadership our country needs,” said Biden. There are three remaining nominations to the Fed board that the president has yet to announce.

Progressive advocates were rooting for Brainard’s nomination as chair of the agency, citing her voting record on the Fed board, her stances supporting tougher Wall Street regulation, and her understanding that the climate crisis should be factored into the Fed’s decisions.

A handful of senators have come out against Powell’s renomination, including Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island), Jeff Merkeley (D-Oregon) and Warren. However, he will still likely be confirmed by the Senate, where he enjoys the support of conservative lawmakers like Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia).

Biden bucked progressive recommendations in nominating Powell for a second term, perhaps as an attempt to appeal to bipartisanship. That appeal may have serious consequences, as economics experts have warned that Powell’s record is alarming during an unstable time for the U.S. economy.

“[A] Powell renomination raises serious concerns simply based on his record,” Gerald Epstein wrote for Truthout in September. While Powell has rightly earned praise for his support of maximum employment and his handling of economic turmoil during the early months of the pandemic, Epstein wrote, “supporters who focus only on these areas are ignoring another crucial component of the Fed’s job — financial regulation and financial stability — where Powell has a much more problematic record.”

As Fed chair, Powell rolled back financial regulations that were put in place after the Great Recession, including Dodd-Frank, legislation that was implemented to prevent predatory mortgage lending and to curb the excessive risk-taking that led to the crisis. Many of the moves Powell made early in the pandemic were only necessary because of existing weaknesses in the financial system, Epstein noted.

The Fed has been embroiled in several scandals during Powell’s tenure — one including Powell himself. Last year, just before the stock market crashed in October, Powell sold between $1 million and $5 million in stock. Vice Chair Richard Clarida made a similar stock transaction in February of 2020, just before new pandemic policy changes were announced.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.