Former President Donald Trump bragged about possessing a secret document that he could not show to others because he did not declassify it in an audio recording obtained by CNN and The New York Times.
Trump on the recording, which was cited in the 37-count indictment handed down by a federal grand jury earlier this month, suggests that he is holding a secret document detailing contingency plans to attack Iran while talking to former chief of staff Mark Meadows’ autobiography ghostwriters.
“These are the papers,” Trump says in the recording, referring to something “highly confidential” as he appears to show it to others in the room.
The quote was not included in the indictment and may undermine Trump’s claim to Fox News last week.
“There was no document. That was a massive amount of papers and everything else talking about Iran and other things,” Trump told the network. “And it may have been held up or may not, but that was not a document. I didn’t have a document, per se. There was nothing to declassify. These were newspaper stories, magazine stories and articles.”
National security attorney Bradley Moss tweeted that the audio shows “this wasn’t newspaper articles. He has the document right there.”
Trump in the recording discusses a New Yorker report that said Chairman of the Joints Chiefs Gen. Mark Milley argued against striking Iran and was concerned that Trump may start a war before leaving office.
“He said that I wanted to attack Iran, Isn’t it amazing?” Trump says as the sound of papers shuffling is heard in the recording. “I have a big pile of papers, this thing just came up. Look. This was him. They presented me this – this is off the record but – they presented me this. This was him. This was the Defense Department and him.”
Trump in the recording admits that he did not declassify the document despite repeated claims that he declassified the material he took home to Mar-a-Lago.
“See as president I could have declassified it,” Trump said. “Now I can’t, you know, but this is still a secret.”
“Now we have a problem,” his staffer added.
“Isn’t that interesting,” Trump said.
“It’s so cool. I mean, it’s so, look, her and I, and you probably almost didn’t believe me, but now you believe me,” Trump added toward the end of the recording, before beckoning an aide to “bring some Cokes in please.”
HEAR TRUMP AUDIO FOR THE FIRST TIME: @CNN clip reveals more details beyond those in the federal indictment including Trump mocking Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server while appearing to share classified docs at his NJ golf club. pic.twitter.com/3H5gwjUiv6
— Paula Reid (@PaulaReidCNN) June 27, 2023
“The audio tape provides context proving, once again, that President Trump did nothing wrong at all,” Trump spokesman Steve Cheung told The New York Times, claiming that Trump was “speaking rhetorically.”
But legal experts say the recording is more damning than the portions of the transcript cited in the indictment and predicted that it could doom Trump’s case.
“The defendant in his own words — essentially narrating his crime,” tweeted New York University Law Prof. Ryan Goodman.
“This is so bad for Trump,” warned MSNBC legal analyst Katie Phang.
“This recording is even more damning than it reads in the indictment,” tweeted former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti.
“They say that a picture is worth a thousand words. This audio could be worth a thousand days behind bars,” he added.
“If the defendant doesn’t go to prison for at least five to ten years, it would be a travesty. The prosecutors have him dead to rights, in more ways than we can count,” agreed conservative attorney and frequent Trump critic George Conway.
“To actually hear a former president of the United States committing a felony ― probably multiple felonies ― on audio tape while laughing about it … I think it’s just stunning,” Conway told CNN, calling the audio “another nail in the coffin.”
Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, who served on a special counsel Bob Mueller’s team, predicted the recording would doom Trump’s defense.
“This is game over if you are following the facts and the law,” he told MSNBC. “He’s charged with having classified information and knowing that he had classified information.”
Garrett Graff, the author of Watergate: A New History, compared Trump’s admission on the tape to the trove of recordings that sunk Richard Nixon during the scandal.
“Speaking as a Watergate historian, there’s nowhere on thousands of hours of Nixon tapes where Nixon makes any comment as clear, as clearly illegal, and as clearly self-aware as this Trump tape,” Graff tweeted, adding that “Nixon’s crimes were many and awful, and yet still not approaching Trump.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.