Weeks after civil rights advocates began receiving notifications from the Department of Education that their cases regarding discrimination in schools were being dismissed, three national groups filed a lawsuit Thursday arguing that the department’s new complaint guidelines are undermining its own obligation to investigate civil rights violations.
“You don’t have be an attorney to know these revisions are unlawful,” Marcie Lipsitt, a disability rights advocate, told Education Week. “They go against the [Office for Civil Rights’] mission statement. “These provisions strip every American of their civil rights and their ability to file civil rights complaints. And the beauty of civil rights complaints has been that everyone has been able to file one.”
Claiming that civil rights complaints can place an “unreasonable burden” on its Office for Civil Rights (OCR), Education Secretary Betsy DeVos as revised the department’s procedures. The new guidelines allow officials to dismiss hundreds of complaints regarding unfair treatment of students of color, inadequate resources for students with disabilities, and other forms of systemic discrimination. The appeals process for resolutions has also being eliminated.
The NAACP, the National Federation of the Blind, and the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates argue that the changes are unlawful and have asked a judge to block the department from enforcing the new guidelines.
Filing complaints with the DOE has been “one way, sometimes the only way, for vulnerable people who can’t afford to litigate, to get their cases heard, and that’s being taken away,” Eve Hill, the plaintiff’s lawyer, told the New York Times.
The new policy will allow the dismissal of cases that fit a “pattern” of multiple complaints filed by individuals or advocacy groups.
For example, Lipsitt — who has been labeled a “frequent flier” by the department — has successfully reached more than 1,000 agreements with schools in which the institutions have agreed to make their websites accessible to people who are deaf or blind. About 500 of Lipsitt’s new complaints have been dismissed, the Times reported.
“No one even knew about this issue until I started filing,” Ms. Lipsitt told the Times last month after the DOE introduced its new procedures. “I didn’t want to get anybody in trouble. I just wanted to raise awareness.”
Joey Poirier, a special education advocate who’s filed dozens of civil rights complaints against school districts in Florida, has also been notified that 10 of his open cases have been closed due to the new procedure.
“These weren’t fraudulent, bogus complaints — these were all complaints that were legitimate,” Poirier told the74million.org, an education news website. “I guess we have selective civil rights in the United States now.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.