Skip to content Skip to footer

Arizona Lawmaker Details Harrowing Abortion Ordeal on State Senate Floor

State laws “interfered” with Eva Burch’s ability to get an abortion, the state senator said.

Arizona State Senator Eva Burch speaks on the senate floor on March 18, 2024.

An Arizona state legislator announced her plans to obtain an abortion during an impassioned speech that criticized the state’s restrictive laws on reproductive care as burdensome and harmful.

State Sen. Eva Burch (D) made the speech before her legislative colleagues on the Arizona Senate floor on Monday. Having experienced multiple miscarriages in the past, the mother of two explained why she made the choice to abort her current pregnancy, which has become nonviable.

“I don’t think people should have to justify their abortions,” Burch, a former nurse practitioner, said during her speech. “But I’m choosing to talk about why I made this decision because I want us to be able to have meaningful conversations about the reality of how the work that we do in this body impacts people in the real world.”

Burch said she found out she was pregnant a few weeks ago. But when she and her husband discovered the pregnancy was no longer viable, they decided an abortion was the proper choice for her own health.

Such decisions “can often be the right health care choice” for individuals for a number of reasons, she explained in her speech, elaborating that she was “not interested in going through” another miscarriage unnecessarily.

“Right now, the safest and most appropriate treatment for me, and the treatment that I choose, is abortion,” the Arizona state senator added.

However, Burch said that state laws made the decision making process burdensome and dangerous.

Burch explained how those laws “interfered” with her desired action. Stating that she sought abortion care on Friday, Burch was told by her doctor that she had to receive an unnecessary and “invasive” transvaginal ultrasound under state law. The doctor was also required to recite “factually false” information about abortion before proceeding, Burch added.

The Arizona lawmaker also had to wait 24 hours before she could get an abortion. As of Monday, she was still pregnant, she told her colleagues.

“The only reason I had to hear those things was a cruel and uninformed attempt by outside forces to shame and coerce and frighten me into making a different decision other than the one I knew was right for me,” Burch said. “There’s no one-size-fits-all script for people seeking abortion care, and the legislature doesn’t have any right to assign one.”

Burch also acknowledged that individuals pregnant beyond the state’s current 15-week limit face an even more excruciating process, including traveling out of state if the procedure isn’t necessary for survival.

The lawmaker called on lawmakers to change laws on abortion care in the state. Failing that, voters should replace anti-abortion lawmakers with better alternatives, she said.

“Our decision-making should be grounded in expert testimony and in consensus from both the medical community and from constituents, and free from political posturing and partisan bias. But that’s not what I see happening,” Burch explained. “So, I truly hope that Arizonans have the opportunity to weigh in on abortion on the ballot in November.”

The future of abortion rights in Arizona is uncertain. Currently, the state Supreme Court is considering whether to reinstate an 1864 territorial law that would prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy. Had that statute been in place a week ago, Burch wouldn’t have been able to obtain an abortion unless her pregnancy posed a severe risk to her life.

Meanwhile, reproductive rights activists are currently collecting signatures to place an abortion access ballot initiative before voters in the November election. The constitutional amendment proposal would establish a “fundamental right to abortion” that would mean the state couldn’t “deny, restrict or interfere” with abortion before fetal viability as determined by a health care provider, usually understood to be around 20-25 weeks. The amendment would also grant abortion exceptions beyond that point to “protect the life or the physical or mental health of a pregnant individual.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 430 new monthly donors in the next 7 days.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy