A federal appeals court has dismissed a bid by Virginia state officials to overturn a lower court’s injunction on the state’s efforts to purge voters from registration rolls.
Late last week, Virginia-based federal Judge Patricia Giles ruled in favor of several voting rights groups, joined by the Department of Justice (DOJ), who had argued that a purge of voting registrations ordered by Gov. Glenn Youngkin in August was in violation of federal voting rights law, particularly one that forbid any kind of purge within 90 days of an upcoming election.
Virginia had tried to remove people from the voting rolls who had previously indicated on Department of Motor Vehicle forms that they weren’t citizens, or had otherwise left that part of a form blank. In the former’s case, it’s possible that those individuals have since become citizens; in the latter’s, they may be citizens who simply made a mistake by omitting that information.
Indeed, dozens of examples of people who were likely U.S. citizens were revealed within the arguments made by the plaintiffs suing the state, including 18 confirmed citizens who were removed from the voter rolls as a result of the state’s purge.
“How many more are there?” Giles asked rhetorically during a hearing.
The action violated the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which requires any removal of voters from voter registration rolls to be “uniform, non-discriminatory, in compliance with the Voting Rights Act and must be completed 90 days before a federal election.”
Soon after, Virginia Republican officials appealed Giles’s ruling to the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. However, a three-judge panel on that court also rejected the state’s arguments over the weekend, agreeing with Giles’s ruling that the state was in violation of the NVRA.
The state was not limited from barring votes from people they discovered to be noncitizens, the federal appeals court found, writing in their opinion that:
Appellants’ claims of irreparable injury absent a stay are weak. Under the preliminary injunction, appellants remain able to prevent noncitizens from voting by canceling registrations on an individualized basis or prosecuting any noncitizen who votes — options the district court specifically flagged at the hearing and in its written order.
Furthermore, the lower court’s ruling was correct by recognizing that “a federal law that functions to prevent last-minute voter registration purges and to ensure that people who are legally entitled to vote are not prevented from doing so by faulty databases or bureaucratic mistakes,” the circuit court wrote.
Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares is planning to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court.
Examples abound of how Virginia Republican lawmakers’ actions directly impacted eligible voters within the state.
In one example, 37-year-old Shantae Martin, a resident who was born in the state, was among those removed from the voter registration rolls as a result of Youngkin’s purge. Martin was only aware of the action after an organization called African Communities Together (a co-plaintiff in the case) alerted her that she had been removed from the rolls.
In another example, Carolina Diaz Tavera, a resident of the state who, according to her affidavit, “meet[s] all qualifications to vote” in Fairfax County, was also purged from the rolls. Diaz Tavera emigrated to the U.S. in 2000, became a citizen in 2013 and has been registered to vote since that year. She also only discovered she had been removed from the rolls in October, after attempting to confirm she was registered.
“I was confused about why my registration was not listed and concerned that I may not be able to vote in the election,” she said in a statement.
In a statement lauding the initial lower court ruling, Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights (VACIR), another co-plaintiff in the case, said the blocking of Youngkin’s purge was “a major step in defending the right to vote in Virginia.”
“Our vote is our voice, and together we will always defend it,” the organization added.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.