After President Joe Biden told the nation during a CNN town hall Tuesday night that he “will not” cancel $50,000 in student loan debt per borrower, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was among the many progressives who pushed back against the president’s false narrative about who would benefit from the move and urged advocates to keep up the pressure.
When a town hall attendee said during Tuesday’s event in Milwaukee, Wisconsin student loan debt is “crushing” her family, friends, and millions of Americans and urged Biden to unilaterally forgive a minimum of $50,000 per borrower, Biden responded, “I will not make that happen.”
The president went on to say that he doesn’t want to forgive “billions of dollars of debt for people who have gone to Harvard and Yale and Penn” instead of using “that money to provide money for early education for young children who… come from disadvantaged circumstances.”
New – Biden completely rejects Schumer/Warren proposal to cancel $50K of student loan debt per borrower:
“I will not make that happen.”
Says he doesn’t want to forgive debts of borrowers from elite schools — and money would be better spent on early childhood education. pic.twitter.com/oDwvCJveOm
— Michael Stratford (@mstratford) February 17, 2021
But Ocasio-Cortez and others argued there is no reason the wealthiest nation on the planet can’t both fund early childhood education and forgive some of the combined $1.8 trillion in student loan debt saddling more than 40 million Americans.
“Nowhere does it say we must trade-off early childhood education for student loan forgiveness,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted late Tuesday. “We can have both.”
The New York Democrat also rejected the notion that attendees of Harvard, Yale, and other elite universities should categorically be denied student loan relief, noting that many people from working-class families attended such prestigious schools and are now saddled with debt due to their inability to afford the sky-high costs.
“Who cares what school someone went to? Entire generations of working-class kids were encouraged to go into more debt under the guise of elitism. This is wrong,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “The case against student loan forgiveness is looking shakier by the day… Biden’s holding back, but many of the arguments against it just don’t hold water on close inspection. We can and should do it. Keep pushing!”
In lieu of canceling $50,000 in student loan debt per borrower — a proposal backed by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and other prominent Democratic lawmakers — Biden said he is “prepared to write off” $10,000 a person, make community college free, and eliminate state school tuition for students whose families earn less than $125,000 a year.
While Biden presented his higher-education proposals as sensible and pragmatic alternatives to unilateral debt cancellation — which he falsely insisted he doesn’t have the authority to carry out — racial justice activist Bree Newsome argued that “there’s nothing practical about Biden’s stance on student loan forgiveness.”
“It’s just an ideological stance on being moderate that isn’t informed by what makes sense from either an economic, gender, or racial justice standpoint,” Newsome wrote. “That’s why he’s out of step with other Dems on this.”
“Why do we have to choose between student loan debt forgiveness and funding childhood education?” Newsome asked. “What does the $10K cap have to do with borrowers from elite schools? Why are we excluding elite schools? There are a bunch of first generation students of color at elite schools.”
Vanessa A. Bee, an editor at Current Affairs, offered a similar — albeit more sharply worded — critique on Twitter:
if you came from a working class family, fought your way into brown, but couldn’t secure enough grants to avoid borrowing, biden’s got a foot to shove up your ass https://t.co/DQx2JZEepF
— vanessa a. bee 🐝✌🏾 (@Vanessa_ABee) February 17, 2021
Biden’s opposition to cancelling $50,000 in student loan debt via executive order is not new. In December, as Common Dreams reported, Biden sparked backlash by saying he’d “be unlikely” to take such a step and questioned whether he could do so legally.
But legal experts have said the president clearly has the authority to direct the secretary of education to cancel $50,000 in student loan debt without congressional approval, a move that a majority of Americans support.
In an analysis (pdf) released last September, Eileen Connor, Deanne Loonin, and Toby Merrill of the Project on Predatory Student Lending wrote that “broad or categorical debt cancellation would be a lawful and permissible exercise of the secretary’s authority under existing law.”
“Yes, POTUS does have the authority to cancel student debt with the stroke of a pen,” Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), the lead House sponsor of a resolution urging Biden to forgive $50,000 in student debt, tweeted late Tuesday. “He can and must use it. The people deserve nothing less.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 231 new monthly donors in the next 2 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy