
We just had another electoral earthquake in the eurozone: Candidates backed by the anti-austerity party Podemos have won local elections in Madrid and Barcelona. And I hope that the IFKATs – or the “institutions formerly known as the troika” – are paying attention.
The essence of Greece’s situation today is that the parameters of a short-term deal are clear and unavoidable: Greece can’t run a primary budget deficit, because nobody will lend the country money. And it won’t (and basically can’t) run a large primary surplus, simply because no more blood can be squeezed from that stone. So one would think that an agreement for Greece to run a modest primary surplus over the next few years would be easy to reach. That is what will happen, so why not make it official?
But now the International Monetary Fund is playing bad cop, declaring that it cannot release funds until Greece’s Syriza party toes the line on pensions and labor market reform. The latter involves dubious economics – the I.M.F.’s own research doesn’t support enthusiasm for structural reforms, especially of the labor market. The former probably recognizes a real problem – it’s unlikely that Greece will be able to deliver what it has promised its pensioners – but why should this be an issue over and above the general question of the primary surplus?
What I would urge everyone to do is ask what happens if Greece is, in fact, pushed out of the eurozone. (Yes, it’s called “Grexit” – an ugly word, but we’re stuck with it.)
It would surely be ugly in Greece, at least at first. Right now the core euro countries believe that the rest of the eurozone can handle Greece’s exit, which might be true. Bear in mind, however, that the supposed firewall of support from the European Central Bank has never actually been tested. If markets lose faith and the time for E.C.B. purchases of Spanish or Italian bonds arises, will they really happen?
But the bigger question is what transpires a year or two after Grexit, when the real risk to the euro isn’t that Greece fails, but that it succeeds. Suppose that a greatly devalued new drachma brings a flood of British beer drinkers to the Ionian Sea, and Greece starts to recover. This would greatly encourage challengers to austerity and internal devaluation elsewhere.
Just the other day the Very Serious Europeans were hailing Spain as a great success story, a vindication of the whole austerity program. But, evidently, the Spanish people don’t agree. And if the anti-establishment forces have a recovering Greece to point to, the discrediting of the establishment will accelerate.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.