Skip to content Skip to footer

Amazon Quelled Workers’ Rights by Forcing Employees Into NDAs, Complaint Alleges

The allegation is made in a complaint filed by the National Labor Relations Board on behalf of a former employee.

Amazon workers unloading boxes from a truck in Manhattan on July 21, 2023 in New York City.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has filed a complaint on behalf of a former Amazon worker alleging that the company’s nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) are overly broad and restrict workers’ rights.

In its filing against the company, the NLRB notes that Amazon required employees from its drone project to sign NDAs that would limit the ability of workers to openly discuss with one another aspects of their work, effectively making it impossible to organize if they chose to do so.

Mary Kate Paradis, a spokesperson for Amazon, defended the NDA practices by claiming it’s similar to other “common” actions other companies regularly take.

“In this instance, the NLRB is taking one line of our agreement out of context and we look forward to showing that through the legal process,” Paradis said to The Seattle Times.

Seth Goldstein, a lawyer who is representing a former employee who was affected by the NDA, disagrees.

“You can’t talk about business operations, you can’t talk about customers, anything that has to do … with the company and its internal workings,” he said. “It’s basically ‘you can’t talk about work.'”

Goldstein represents former Amazon drone worker Cheddi Skeete. Skeete, who is Black, also sued the company in January alleging he faced racial discrimination and retaliation from the company for bringing up safety concerns. Skeete said he understands the need for NDAs when it comes to proprietary reasons, but added that “an employee should be able to freely speak on things” when it affects workers’ rights.

The NDA itself requires employees to “not acquire, use, publish, disclose, or communicate any Confidential Information except as required in connection with Employee’s work without the prior written approval of an authorized officer of Amazon.” “Confidential Information” includes any information “not otherwise generally known to the public,” such as the company’s “business, projects, products, customers, suppliers, inventions, or trade secrets,” as well as “published and unpublished know-how … Amazon pricing policies … and future plans relating to any aspect of Amazon’s present or anticipated business.”

The language of the NDA doesn’t just extend to limiting conversations with people outside the company, but within it as well, the complaint alleges, making it difficult for workers to discuss aspects of their job that may otherwise compel them to organize and demand better working conditions.

The NDA “was overbroad” and “didn’t allow [Skeete] to talk about anything at the company,” Goldstein said.

“If you can’t talk about anything at work, it becomes very difficult to organize and engage in collective action, or speak out about anything,” he added.

According to Goldstein, the NDA applies to “almost a million” workers at the company, at all of its U.S. locations. Goldstein is confident he and his client will succeed, due to recent actions by NLRB, including deciding that overly broad noncompete agreements violate workers’ rights, too.

A hearing on the matter is scheduled for July next year.

The NLRB has accused Amazon of unfair labor practices in the past, including in 2022, when the federal agency said there was “merit” to workers’ complaints about the company requiring workers to attend anti-union meetings at a Staten Island facility where labor organizers won the right to organize later that year. In that same filing, the NLRB also found merit to complaints from the workers who formed the Amazon Labor Union, which accused the company of telling workers they would withhold benefits if they voted to organize.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy