The Obama administration, whose efforts to bring high-speed rail to the United States were sidetracked by Republican governors in a couple of states, pressed ahead with its vision of building a national rail network on Tuesday when it called for spending $53 billion on passenger trains and high-speed rail projects over the next six years.
The proposal, made by Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. at 30th Street Station in Philadelphia, would move the country closer to the president’s goal of making high-speed rail accessible to 80 percent of Americans within 25 years.
But it comes as President Obama’s efforts to bring bullet trains to America have gone from the “Yes We Can” optimism of his campaign slogan to the less certain “I think I can, I think I can” of a certain storybook train engine. Newly elected Republicans governors have halted new rail projects, and a new Republican majority in the House has questioned the administration’s rail strategy.
Many rail proponents cheered the proposal, especially the idea of making rail a regular part of the nation’s transportation program so that long-term projects could be planned without uncertainty over whether money would be available later.
Mr. Biden cast it as an investment in the future. “As a longtime Amtrak rider and advocate,” he said, “I understand the need to invest in a modern rail system that will help connect communities, reduce congestion and create quality, skilled manufacturing jobs that cannot be outsourced.”
But Republicans were wary. They have questioned the projects the administration selected for the $10.5 billion in rail money that has been approved so far, noting that much of it was spread around to conventional train service and questioning the suitability of the two true high-speed projects that are included: a relatively short 84-mile line in Florida connecting Tampa and Orlando, and a stretch along the California Central Valley that would eventually be part of a line from Los Angeles to San Francisco.
Representative John L. Mica, Republican of Florida and chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, expressed “extreme reservations” about the proposal. “This is like giving Bernie Madoff another chance at handling your investment portfolio,” he said in a statement.
Mr. Mica favors high-speed rail but would prefer to direct the money to the corridor that links Washington, Philadelphia, New York and Boston. “Rather than focusing on the Northeast Corridor, the most congested corridor in the nation and the only corridor owned by the federal government, the administration continues to squander limited taxpayer dollars on marginal projects,” he said.
This article “Administration Pitches Big Rail Projects” originally appeared at The New York Times.
© 2011 The New York Times Company
Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.
Briefly, we wanted to update you on where Truthout stands this month.
To be brutally honest, Truthout is behind on our fundraising goals for the year. There are a lot of reasons why. We’re dealing with broad trends in our industry, trends that have led publications like Vice, BuzzFeed, and National Geographic to make painful cuts. Everyone is feeling the squeeze of inflation. And despite its lasting importance, news readership is declining.
To ensure we stay out of the red by the end of the year, we have a long way to go. Our future is threatened.
We’ve stayed online over two decades thanks to the support of our readers. Because you believe in the power of our work, share our transformative stories, and give to keep us going strong, we know we can make it through this tough moment.
We’ve launched a campaign to raise $38,000 in the next 5 days. Please consider making a donation today.