Skip to content Skip to footer

Ad Wars Escalate Ahead of 2018 Midterm Elections

Democrats vying for congressional seats have aired more ads than Republican candidates.

Over 2.2 million spots have aired in congressional and gubernatorial races, totaling nearly $1 billion at this point in the 2018 election cyclea 70 percent increase from the same period in 2014 midterm elections, according to a new report by the Wesleyan Media Project in partnership with the Center for Responsive Politics.

For outside groups, the jump was even more precipitous with congressional and gubernatorial TV ad airings up 85 percent from the comparable period in the 2014 midterm cycle.

Outside groups are airing a larger volume of ads in federal races for US House and US Senate races this cycle compared to the same dates in 2014 and the portion of advertising made up by outside groups has also grown.

Democrats dominate spending in House races while Republicans are winning the money race in the Senate and gubernatorial elections.

Florida’s Senate racewhich has been the most expensive election this year and is projected to potentially become one of the most expensive Senate campaigns in US historyhas seen the most ads of any Senate race during the two weeks following Labor Day. Republicans continue to outspend Democrats with more than twice the number of ads aired in support of Governor Rick Scott than incumbent Democrat Bill Nelson (D-Fl).

In all but one of the other top 10 Senate races, Democrats held an ad advantage measured through advertising volume with Texas as the sole outlier.

The data in the report generally supports the conventional wisdom that the most competitive races have seen the most ad spending by outside groups, with outside groups accounting for one out of every five ads in the most competitive Senate races. Outside group sponsored advertising makes up more than half of the ads in Missouri and West Virginia, while more than one in every three ads in Indiana, Arizona, Nevada, and North Dakota have been paid for by outside groups.

On the House side, thirteen races have seen at least 2,000 ad airings in the last two weeks alone. Of those thirteen races, nine have featured significant outside group spending. The race for Colorado’s 6th District has seen nearly 64 percent of the ads from outside groups.

As with the Senate, Democrats vying for House seats have aired more ads than Republican candidatesdominating ad spending by Republican candidates in 21 of the top 25 races analyzed in the report.

The most active outside spending group in the last two weeks has been Majority Forwarda non-disclosing 501(c)(4) nonprofit required to keep politicking to less than half its activities and is linked to Democratic leadership in the Senatewhich has run more than 13,410 spots in six Senate races at an estimated cost of more than $3 million in the last two weeks alone.

Other “dark money” groups among top advertising spenders in the last two weeks include One Nation, Americans for Prosperity, and an affiliate of the Republican Governors Association called State Solutions.

Almost all of the spending by outside groups backing Democrats in Senate races since Labor Day has come from “dark money” sources like Majority Forward, with groups that do not disclose their donors accounting for 92 percent of spending backing Democrats running for Senate seats.

In contrast, around three-quarters of ads backing Democrats in House races have come from disclosing groups.

Advertising supporting Republican candidates in Senate races has stemmed primarily from disclosing groups like the Senate Leadership Fund while almost half of all spending backing Republican in House races has come from one group, Congressional Leadership Fund (CLF). As a super PAC, CLF is required to disclose donors but has received substantial funding from “dark money” sources. This has included millions in contributions from American Action Network, a politically active 501(c)(4) nonprofit focused on center-right policies that share an executive director with the CLF and doesn’t have to disclose its donors.

Of the nearly 280,000 US House or Senate TV ads that have aired since Labor Day, around half — 48 percent — were from groups that do not disclose their donors.

That may soon change after a recent lawsuit that created a path for stronger disclosure requirements that apply to “dark money” groups. New requirements could require all “dark money” groups that spend at least $250 in independent expenditures to report every donor who gave at least $200 in the past year as well as those who give with the reported purpose of financing independent expenditures general, but the full impact is yet to be seen.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.